Last but not least, there are no clear, IMO, advantages is using it, despite the fact you'll see less boilerplate code. This laziness is something I don't understand. IDEs will generate setters/getters for you just with a shortcut on classes with thousands of fields.
Il giorno dom 19 nov 2023 alle ore 14:47 Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hello, > > Let me add also add a couple of points: > 1. It's true that is just a compile dependency but when you decide to use > lombok, you also decide that everyone else who deals with your code will > have to use lombok. Lombok is special in that it is a build-time dependency > and your IDE needs plugins to figure out what is going on. So this is a big > drawback in my opinion. > 2. Going back from Lombok to without Lombok, in big projects is not easy. > Delombok is not an answer, because it's not reliable. > 3. We are using the javadoc on getter and setter for generating > documentation, with Lombok we need to find a different way and since the > code is generated I don't think it would be easy. > 4. Debugging Lombok is a pain. > > and I could go ahead. > > Il giorno dom 19 nov 2023 alle ore 14:12 Claus Ibsen < > claus.ib...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> Hi >> >> No lombok is not allowed - we have as minimal dependency as possible. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 2:06 PM Steve973 <steve...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hello. I completely understand the perspective of limiting the >> addition of >> > libraries for various reasons, and especially when the library is >> included >> > in the distribution. I know that I have asked about Lombok before, but >> it >> > is great for eliminating a lot of boilerplate code, especially when a >> class >> > cannot be created as a Java 17 record. Also, Lombok is a compile-only >> > dependency that uses annotation processing to generate the >> aforementioned >> > boilerplate. The license also seems compatible. Is this something that >> > can be used in the coding of a component? If not, could somebody please >> > explain the problem with it? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Steve >> > >> >> >> -- >> Claus Ibsen >> ----------------- >> @davsclaus >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >> >
