Hi Clause, Thx for clarifying. Would this be backported to 3.22.x as well once finished?
Regards, Benjamin Am 14. Februar 2024 06:54:25 MEZ schrieb Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>: >Hi > >Yeah the doc is a bit outdated, and we should also only use source >name:line if explicit enabled >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20418 > >On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 8:03 PM Benjamin Graf <benjamin.g...@gmx.net.invalid> >wrote: > >> Hi together, >> >> I'm struggling what would be the expected order for logName evaluation. >> The docs ( >> https://camel.apache.org/components/4.0.x/eips/log-eip.html#_configuring_logging_name) >> says if not defined, it'll use the routeId set or a generated one. Looking >> into code of LogReifier ( >> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/3793981daa32567a25a2aa1628a986658f863171/core/camel-core-reifier/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/reifier/LogReifier.java#L70) >> it would use getLineNumberLoggerName() before any kind of routeId first. >> >> What is the wanted order code or doc? Seems to be a bug, anyway :) >> >> Regards, >> >> Benjamin >> > > -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
