hi, Nikita Gubenko
The configuration of HostAllocator node in your components.xml is ok.
Btw, did you restart management server after you changed the
vm.allocation.algorithm value in global configuration and before create your
user VM instance ?
------------------
Regards,
ChunFeng
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Nikita Gubenko"<nikita.gube...@gmail.com>;
Date: Wed, Apr 24, 2013 10:04 PM
To: "users"<users@cloudstack.apache.org>;
Subject: Re: VM allocation scheduler
I have this
<adapters key="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.HostAllocator">
<adapter name="FirstFitRouting"
class="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitRoutingAllocator"/>
<!--adapter name="FirstFitRouting"
class="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.RecreateHostAllocator"/-->
<!--adapter name="FirstFit"
class="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator"/-->
</adapters>
at /usr/src/apache-cloudstack-4.0.1-incubating-src/client/tomcatconf/
components.xml.in
How should I change this to get balanced/random distribution?
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:54 PM, ChunFeng <chunf...@domolo.com> wrote:
> hi, Nikita Gubenko
>
>
> When using random allocation algorithm to deploy VNs to hosts in
> cluster , as we expected , should make a balanced distribution .
>
>
> In your cluster the VMs distribution was 14:6 , though the total
> numbers of VMs is fewer , but make some sense.
>
>
> I think you should check the adapters item in components.xml file in
> which HostAllocator using .
>
>
> <adapters
> key="com.cloud.agent.manager.allocator.HostAllocator">
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> ChunFeng
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From: "Nikita Gubenko"<nikita.gube...@gmail.com>;
> Date: Wed, Apr 24, 2013 04:24 AM
> To: "users"<users@cloudstack.apache.org>;
>
> Subject: VM allocation scheduler
>
>
> Hi
> I have cluster with two xenserver hosts in it. vm.allocation.algorithm is
> set to random. When I try to create 20 vms the allocation algorithm works
> strange - it allocates 14 one host (where console proxy + ssvm also) and 6
> to other host (+VR). Should it work like that?
>
>
> Thanks
> --
> Best Regards, Nikita Gubenko
>
--
Best Regards, Nikita Gubenko
