Feng,

Did you solve this mail along with the other one you send? It seems
like the same question.

regards,
Daan

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:26 PM, 不坏阿峰 <onlydeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> wish some expert come to help me.~~`
>
> 2013/8/24 不坏阿峰 <onlydeb...@gmail.com>:
>> can someone help?
>>
>> 2013/8/23 不坏阿峰 <onlydeb...@gmail.com>:
>>> i did it.    Guestvlan300 Isolated  192.168.31.0/24  ,Egress rule,
>>> 0.0.0.0/0 all.
>>> and when i initail vrouter on Xen host,  guest host  can access
>>> internet.  but vroute on kvm+openvswitch Host  can not.
>>>
>>> 2013/8/23 Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com>:
>>>> I believe you have to create an egress networking rule to allow for vm's to
>>>> reach the internet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:53 PM, 不坏阿峰 <onlydeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> vm with openvswitch+KVM can not access extranal network, can ping gateway
>>>>>
>>>>> Cloudstack4.1.1
>>>>> A: one kvm host ubuntu12.04 with openvswitch,
>>>>> B:  xen server6.0,
>>>>> C: one kvm host centos with openvswitch
>>>>>
>>>>> in cloudstack have two network.
>>>>> Guestvlan301 Isolated 192.168.31.0/24 ,Egress rule,   0.0.0.0/0 all
>>>>> Guestvlan300 Isolated  192.168.31.0/24  ,Egress rule,   0.0.0.0/0 all
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ①:vrouter301 run on Xen,   Public IP Address 192.168.240.54 Guest IP
>>>>> Address 192.168.31.1
>>>>>    vm in vlan301 ,can ping gateway 192.168.31.1 and can access
>>>>> internet. vm can run on kvm or xen, both ok.
>>>>>
>>>>> ②:vronter300 run on Kvm with openvswitch,   Public IP Address
>>>>> 192.168.240.53 Guest IP Address 192.168.30.1
>>>>>    vm in vlan300 ,can ping gateway 192.168.30.1, but can not access
>>>>> internet.  vrouter can access internet.
>>>>>
>>>>> how to make vm under kvm+openvswitch to access outside network and 
>>>>> internet
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@centos-kvm01 libvirt]# ovs-vsctl show
>>>>> 7cb5f505-7ac1-4403-9f9d-101882ed7bad
>>>>>     Bridge kvmmgt
>>>>>         Port kvmmgt
>>>>>             Interface kvmmgt
>>>>>                 type: internal
>>>>>         Port "eth0"
>>>>>             Interface "eth0"
>>>>>     Bridge "cloudbr0"
>>>>>         Port "cloudbr0"
>>>>>             Interface "cloudbr0"
>>>>>                 type: internal
>>>>>         Port "eth1"
>>>>>             Interface "eth1"           ## Eth1 uplink port is Esxi
>>>>> vswitch in promiscuous mode,  Xen server Eth1 uplink this too, can
>>>>> work fine ; Kvm use native bridge work fine too.
>>>>>         Port "vnet3"
>>>>>             tag: 240
>>>>>             Interface "vnet3"
>>>>>         Port "vnet0"
>>>>>             tag: 301
>>>>>             Interface "vnet0"
>>>>>         Port "vnet1"
>>>>>             tag: 300
>>>>>             Interface "vnet1"
>>>>>         Port "vnet4"
>>>>>             tag: 240
>>>>>             Interface "vnet4"
>>>>>     Bridge "cloud0"
>>>>>         Port "cloud0"
>>>>>             Interface "cloud0"
>>>>>                 type: internal
>>>>>         Port "vnet2"
>>>>>             Interface "vnet2"
>>>>>     Bridge storage
>>>>>         Port "eth2"
>>>>>             Interface "eth2"
>>>>>         Port storage
>>>>>             Interface storage
>>>>>                 type: internal
>>>>>     ovs_version: "1.10.0"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i do the test,
>>>>>   one VM 192.168.30.90  run  ping 192.168.123.1
>>>>>   vrouter 192.168.30.1(outside IP 192.168.240.53 vlan 240)  run  ping
>>>>> www.google.com
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@centos-kvm01 ~]# ovs-dpctl dump-flows |grep 30.90
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> in_port(9),eth(src=02:00:07:94:00:09,dst=02:00:3c:30:00:06),eth_type(0x0806),arp(sip=192.168.30.1,tip=192.168.30.90,op=2,sha=02:00:07:94:00:09,tha=02:00:3c:30:00:06),
>>>>> packets:0, bytes:0, used:never, actions:push_vlan(vid=300,pcp=0),5
>>>>>
>>>>> in_port(11),eth(src=06:28:b6:00:01:20,dst=00:50:56:97:5c:55),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.30.90,dst=192.168.123.1,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=63,frag=no),icmp(type=8,code=0),
>>>>> packets:5855, bytes:573790, used:0.810s,
>>>>> actions:push_vlan(vid=240,pcp=0),5
>>>>>
>>>>> in_port(5),eth(src=02:00:3c:30:00:06,dst=02:00:07:94:00:09),eth_type(0x8100),vlan(vid=300,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x0806),arp(sip=192.168.30.90,tip=192.168.30.1,op=1,sha=02:00:3c:30:00:06,tha=00:00:00:00:00:00)),
>>>>> packets:0, bytes:0, used:never, actions:pop_vlan,9
>>>>>
>>>>> in_port(5),eth(src=02:00:3c:30:00:06,dst=02:00:07:94:00:09),eth_type(0x8100),vlan(vid=300,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.30.90,dst=192.168.123.1,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=no),icmp(type=8,code=0)),
>>>>> packets:5855, bytes:597210, used:0.809s, actions:pop_vlan,9
>>>>>
>>>>> ######   actions:push_vlan(vid=240,pcp=0),5  ,  this is maybe have
>>>>> some problem !!!!!!!  is it??
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@centos-kvm01 ~]# ovs-dpctl dump-flows |grep 240.53
>>>>>
>>>>> in_port(11),eth(src=06:28:b6:00:01:20,dst=00:50:56:97:5c:55),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=192.168.240.53,dst=74.125.128.105,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=64,frag=no),icmp(type=8,code=0),
>>>>> packets:6167, bytes:604366, used:0.486s,
>>>>> actions:push_vlan(vid=240,pcp=0),5
>>>>>
>>>>> in_port(5),eth(src=00:50:56:97:5c:55,dst=06:28:b6:00:01:20),eth_type(0x8100),vlan(vid=240,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x0806),arp(sip=192.168.240.1,tip=192.168.240.53,op=1,sha=00:50:56:97:5c:55,tha=00:00:00:00:00:00)),
>>>>> packets:0, bytes:0, used:never, actions:pop_vlan,11
>>>>>
>>>>> in_port(5),eth(src=00:50:56:97:5c:55,dst=06:28:b6:00:01:20),eth_type(0x8100),vlan(vid=240,pcp=0),encap(eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(src=74.125.128.105,dst=192.168.240.53,proto=1,tos=0,ttl=49,frag=no),icmp(type=0,code=0)),
>>>>> packets:6059, bytes:618018, used:0.450s, actions:pop_vlan,11
>>>>>
>>>>> in_port(11),eth(src=06:28:b6:00:01:20,dst=00:50:56:97:5c:55),eth_type(0x0806),arp(sip=192.168.240.53,tip=192.168.240.1,op=2,sha=06:28:b6:00:01:20,tha=00:50:56:97:5c:55),
>>>>> packets:0, bytes:0, used:never, actions:push_vlan(vid=240,pcp=0),5
>>>>>

Reply via email to