I totally agree with Tomasz, I do not think that using a distributed FS as
primary storage is a good idea, but as a secondary it sounds interesting.

But, off course you can try *;*)


2013/9/11 Shanker Balan <shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com>

> On 11-Sep-2013, at 5:14 PM, Tomasz Zięba <t.a.zi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some time ago I tried to use GlusterFS as storage for cloudstacka but I
> > noticed that cloudstack uses the default settings for mount command.
> >
> > By default mount command is using the UDP protocol but glusterfs works
> only
> > using tcp.
> > I think, if cloudstack developers could add "-o proto=tcp" to code
> > glusterfs should works.
> >
> > For example:
> > /bin/mount -t nfs -o proto=tcp IP:/share /mnt/gluster/
> >
> > If you are using CitrixXen you should mount the share and make it as SR.
> > For cloudstacka is clear because you should use the option PreSetup when
> > creating PrimaryStorage.
> >
> > Personally, I doubt that using GlusterFS as a primary storage is a good
> > solution but for secondary storage it should be very usefull.
>
>
> And maybe as a Swift backend.
>
>
>
> --
> @shankerbalan
>
> M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
> shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
> ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre,
> Bangalore - 560 055
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
> trademark.
>



-- 
Rafael Weingartner

Reply via email to