Did you allow ping traffic in ingress rules in the guest network? -----Original Message----- From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 2:44 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start
So after changing my gateway to public address my System VMs started, I was able to download a ISO install an instance but I'm unable to ping the instance, or the VR, guest CIDR 10.1.1.0/24 guest traffic is in the same network as public traffic using vlan 100. this is how eth0 public interface looks like DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=cloudbr0 DEVICE=eth0.99 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes VLAN=yes DEVICE=eth0.100 HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 ONBOOT=yes VLAN=yes I'm not sure if this is correct? Thanks, On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM, motty cruz <motty.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you very much, > my gateway was set to local network, > > Thanks, > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Amogh Vasekar > <amogh.vase...@citrix.com>wrote: > >> Possibly - Your default gateway on the host is set to your internal >> 192.* gateway? What does route -n say? >> >> Thanks, >> Amogh >> >> On 10/11/13 9:18 AM, "motty cruz" <motty.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Thank you for your reply, I blow out my installation, started from >> >scratch; you mentioned that we don't configure bridge for guest VLAN >> >traffic but Cloudstack did not configure it automatically. Also, I >> >noticied after installed cloudstack-agent and configure advance zone >> >four new interfaces appear vnet0 - vnet3. I don't know what that is. >> >root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show >> >bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >> >cloud0 8000.fe00a9fe025f no vnet0 >> >cloudbr0 8000.0015177b6765 no eth0 >> > vnet2 >> >cloudbr1 8000.0015177b6764 no eth1 >> > vnet1 >> > vnet3 >> >virbr0 8000.525400643b18 yes virbr0-nic >> > >> >after re-installing Cloudstack-management on the management server >> >and Cloudstack-agent on the KVM host configure two bridge cloudbr0 >> >for public/guest and Cloudbr1 for managemen/storage, now my system >> >VMs are running but when trying to download and iso, I get the >> >follwoing error >> "No >> >route to host", >> >here is my cloudbr0 bridge for public/guest traffic >> >[root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr0 >> >DEVICE=cloudbr0 >> >ONBOOT=yes >> >TYPE=Bridge >> >IPADDR=xxx.xxxx.xxx >> >GATEWAY=xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxx >> >NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >> >DNS1=8.8.8.8 >> > >> >base on eth0 >> >DEVICE=eth0 >> >HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65 >> >ONBOOT=yes >> >BRIDGE=cloudbr0 >> > >> >Thanks again, >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu < >> >sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Please post management server log and agent log from kvm (with >> >> debug >> >> enabled) to find out the issue . >> >> We don't have to created bridge with guest vlan for guest traffic. >> >> Cloudstack will configure it automatically on kvm when required. >> >> >> >> -Sanjeev >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com] >> >> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:50 PM >> >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> >> Subject: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I posted this problem in the past and got no help, so I'm trying >> >> my >> luck >> >> again I install CS 4.2, configure advance zone for KVM cluster >> >>here is my brctl >> >> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show >> >> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >> >> cloud0 8000.fe00a9fe0212 no vnet0 >> >> cloudbr0 8000.0015177b6765 no eth0 >> >> vnet1 >> >> vnet3 >> >> cloudbr1 8000.0015177b6764 no eth1 >> >> vnet2 >> >> cloudbr99 8000.0015177b6764 no eth1.99 >> >> virbr0 8000.52540089a4da yes virbr0-nic >> >> >> >> I'm using inteface eth0 for management >> >> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth0 >> >> DEVICE=eth0 >> >> ONBOOT=yes >> >> BRIDGE=cloudbr0 >> >> >> >> here is bridge for eth0 >> >> DEVICE=cloudbr0 >> >> ONBOOT=yes >> >> TYPE=Bridge >> >> IPADDR=192.168.0.10 >> >> NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >> >> GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 >> >> DNS1=8.8.8.8 >> >> >> >> I'm using eth1 for public/guest >> >> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth1 >> >> DEVICE=eth1 >> >> ONBOOT=yes >> >> BRIDGE=cloudbr1 >> >> >> >> here is bridge to public network untag in vlan 1 by default >> >> DEVICE=cloudbr1 >> >> ONBOOT=yes >> >> TYPE=Bridge >> >> IPADDR=98.234.34.208 >> >> NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >> >> >> >> I created VLAN 99 for guest traffic >> >> DEVICE=eth1.99 >> >> ONBOOT=yes >> >> VLAN=yes >> >> BRIDGE=cloudbr99 >> >> >> >> DEVICE=cloudbr99 >> >> ONBOOT=yes >> >> TYPE=Bridge >> >> IPADDR=10.1.1.2 >> >> NETMASK=255.255.255.0 >> >> DNS1=8.8.8.8 >> >> >> >> I'm using CLVM for primary storage, I noticed system vms were >> >> created >> >> lvm> lvscan >> >> inactive >> >>'/dev/hitachi-1/c490e01b-4e40-40fb-aa56-fbedd89b86cd' >> >> [1.95 GiB] inherit >> >> inactive >> >>'/dev/hitachi-1/ec032d27-26a4-467b-a1da-222402eedd60' >> >> [1.95 GiB] inherit >> >> ACTIVE '/dev/vg_kvm2/lv_root' [189.20 GiB] inherit >> >> ACTIVE '/dev/vg_kvm2/lv_swap' [31.51 GiB] inherit >> >> lvm> >> >> >> >> here is my age.properties file: >> >> #Storage >> >> #Thu Oct 10 09:47:57 PDT 2013 >> >> guest.network.device=cloudbr99 >> >> workers=5 >> >> private.network.device=cloudbr0 >> >> port=8250 >> >> resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourc >> >> e >> >> pod=1 >> >> zone=1 >> >> guid=10d96879-df46-3b97-9428-85e2934e0b95 >> >> public.network.device=cloudbr1 >> >> cluster=1 >> >> local.storage.uuid=7c563a7d-e257-48da-9133-cf5ae8973761 >> >> domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm >> >> LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 >> >> host=192.168.0.5 >> >> >> >> >> >> but System VMs are not starting, can someone tell me if VLAN are >> >>configure right? >> >> >> >> log: >> >> 2013-10-10 10:17:58,838 DEBUG >> >> [network.lb.LBHealthCheckManagerImpl] >> >> (LBHealthCheck-1:null) LB HealthCheck Manager is running and >> >> getting >> the >> >> updates from LB providers and updating service status >> >> >> >> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,049 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >> >> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 2 VMs on host 1 >> >> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,060 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >> >> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 0 VM, not running on host 1 >> >> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,049 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >> >> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 2 VMs on host 1 >> >> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,060 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] >> >> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 0 VM, not running on host 1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> >> >> >
