Create share network with your ip ranges and add vm nic to in the share network.

-Jayapal

On 18-Oct-2013, at 10:51 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu <sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com>
 wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> If you are creating isolated network with your /27 cidr and deploying vm in 
> that , default gateway on the vm will always points to ip address configured 
> on the virtual routers guest interface. So for the vms to point to the 
> gateway in /27 cidr, create a shared network and deploy vm in that.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sanjeev
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Manske [mailto:br...@manske.org] 
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 1:20 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0
> 
> All,
> 
> Now I'm curious about public IPs on Guest VMs within CloudStack 4.2.0.
> 
> I have one IPv4 /27 for Public IPs and that's working fine.  Now what I want 
> to do is assign a live IP address from another /27 to a Guest VM, which 
> appears to work but can't actually touch the default gateway.
> 
> So here's the rub: The default gateway is actually provided as a virtual IP 
> on two VRRP nodes (for A/B redundancy) by my upstream provider.  I can ping 
> the two VRRP routers, I can see the VM has the proper IP address, netmask, 
> and default gateway; and I can configure the VM with a proper IP config which 
> never finds the default gateway IP.  The arp cache sees the local MAC address 
> and incomplete for the gateway.
> 
> So now I'm thinking; according to cloudstack, is the default gateway plumbed 
> on a virtual router?  If so, how does THAT route out to the world?
> 
> I also have a /64 of IPv6 space, /96 of which I have configured in a network 
> offering which has the same upstream infrastructure situation.  Same lack of 
> functionality there.
> 
> So how do I configure my Guest real IP netblocks?  Is it okay to be looking 
> for a default gateway IP on a my provider's core router or do I need to have 
> them statically route that netblock to something like the cloudstack 
> management host?
> 
> Of course I could also have the network offering wrong or incomplete.
> 
> Any thoughts or pointers to documentation would be appreciated.
> 
> I can tell I'm making progress because I keep dealing with progressively 
> higher level errors. :)
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Bryan Manske
> 
> 
> ---
> "Earnest falsehoods left unchallenged risk being accepted as fact."
> -- Monty "xiphmont" Montgomery - Xiph Foundation, on the Ogg format
> ---

Reply via email to