Hi Pääkkönen. Cloudstack is the management/ochestration tool that lives above the Hypervisor.
So Cloudstack manages your Xen/KVM/Hyper-V/VMWare virtualized environment. Cloudstack is designed to manage from very few hosts to many many hundreds of hosts. Regards Ronald On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Pääkkönen Pekka <pekka.paakko...@vtt.fi>wrote: > Hi Daan, > > Maybe I should have been clearer. > I was wondering about the implications for performance. > Would performance in a database clustering use case be better with plain > Xen (or other virtualization solution), when compared to CloudStack with > Xen? > Or is this an unnecessary concern? > > Also, is CloudStack aimed for clusters consisting of tens/hundreds of such > rack servers, or is it suitable also for smaller deployments? > > Pekka > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: 3. maaliskuuta 2014 12:28 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Suitable solution for HW > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Pääkkönen Pekka <pekka.paakko...@vtt.fi> > wrote: > > Or would a virtualization solution (for example Xen) be a better choice? > > > I don't understand your question or you don't understand cloudstack, > Pekka. Using cloudstack you would still need a virtualization server like > Xen. If you are on;ly using one and don't foresee any migration of running > VMs go with that. If you have uptime requirements that span beyond the > livetime of your hardware, use cloudstack. > > -- > Daan >
