Thank you.

One last question (most likely)...

What difference would it between having a separate storage server as SANS or 
NAS (especially utilizing something like FreeNAS) for live vm storage + 
failover? At least in the instance of using CS for a cloud platform.

Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 5:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: New Initial Setup Questions (THANK YOU in advance)

On 31.03.2014 20:47, Talk Jesus wrote:
>>> The way HA works is ACS will monitor your VMs and HV, if one HV goes
> down it will attempt to restart the VMs running on that HV on another 
> HV, but for this to happen the "new" HV needs to be able to access the 
> storage those VMs were using and this can only happen if you use 
> shared storage. Do I make sense?
> 
> Hmm. Not 100% sure I understand, but getting closer :)
> 
> So, "shared storage" would be a separate "storage server", plus at 
> least 1 extra for a failover? And, if I understand correctly, this 
> "HA" option is all configured and enabled within the CloudStack 
> management console itself?
> 
> Sorry if I'm not picking up quickly, but I'm getting it a bit more 
> clear understanding with a few questions for clarification sake.
> 
> Basically, say I'd like to start a small initial setup to offer cloud 
> VM's (or popular term "vps / virtual private server" in the cloud).
> I'll have one server strictly for the CS management console, I'll have 
> one HV + 1 extra for failover for CPU/Memory, and then I'll have a 
> storage server + another for failover. Would this make sense?

Yes, this makes sense. The failover SAN/storage is optional.

Good luck!

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

Reply via email to