Hi,

What does mean "In 4.3 traffic labels are not considering" ?
It's temporary or " traffic labels " is deprecated now ?


Does mean, anyone with KVM traffic labels environment can't upgrade to
4.3.0?





On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Suresh Sadhu <suresh.sa...@citrix.com>wrote:

> Did you used traffic name labels?
>
> In 4.3 traffic labels are not considering ,by default its attaching to
> default  traffic labels(eg:in KVM its cloudbr0 ...due to this unable to
> access public network i.r before upgrade if ieth2 attached cloudbr1 and
> after upgrade its attached to cloudbr0).maybe you are hitting this issue.
>
> Regards
> sadhu
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 10 April 2014 19:28
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.3 instances can't access outside world
>
> yes I can ping VR, also after the upgrade VR has four insterfaces, eth0
> subnet for Instances, eth1, eth2 for public IP and eth3 for public IP.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Can you ping the VR? Log on to the VR, and get the iptables rules. How
> > do they look?
> >
> > Erik Weber
> > 10. apr. 2014 00:21 skrev "motty cruz" <motty.c...@gmail.com> følgende:
> >
> > > I did add egress rules, reboot network but no sucess, so I removed
> > > that rules and nothing.
> > >
> > > I am lost.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Did you remove the egress rule again? If not, try that.
> > > >
> > > > Erik
> > > > 9. apr. 2014 15:49 skrev "motty cruz" <motty.c...@gmail.com>
> følgende:
> > > >
> > > > > yes I try adding the rule, restart network and router but no
> success!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Erik Weber
> > > > > <terbol...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Try adding an egress rule, and removing it again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We experience the same, but has so far believed it was because
> > > > > > we
> > > > changed
> > > > > > the default rule from deny to allow after accounts were made..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:14 PM, motty cruz
> > > > > > <motty.c...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have two isolated network both virtual routers can ping
> > anywhere,
> > > > but
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > Instances behind the virtual router can't ping or access the
> > > > internet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, motty cruz <
> > motty.c...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > I'm having issues with VMs unable to access outside world.
> > > > > > > > I
> > can
> > > > ping
> > > > > > > > gateway, also when I log in to virtual router, I am able
> > > > > > > > to
> > ping
> > > > > > > > google.com or anywhere.
> > > > > > > > in the Egress rules I am allowing all. reboot network and
> > virtual
> > > > > > router
> > > > > > > > does not help.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > VMs were able to access outside before upgrading from 4.2
> > > > > > > > to
> > 4.3.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > any ideas?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/gmail Pc"  webcons on secure

Reply via email to