So if I upgrade to 4.4 once it is available do I still need to follow the steps 
for realhostip migration?

On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Amogh Vasekar <amogh.vase...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Please refer to 
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/12350 for the
> bugs that may exist in versions prior to CloudStack 4.4
> 
> Thanks,
> Amogh
> 
> On 6/17/14 9:33 PM, "Shweta Agarwal" <shweta.agar...@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
>> Its supported for 4.2 , 4.3 and 4.4 as well.
>> 
>> 
>> Shweta
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:50 PM
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Realhostip.com Migration
>> 
>> Rich,
>> 
>> I followed the Citrix KB article referenced here (
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Realhost+IP+changes
>> )
>> with 4.2 and it worked fine for me using SSL.  Just remember to get a
>> wildcard SSL cert, and be careful pasting it into the CloudStack UI.
>> 
>> -tim
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard Chatterton <
>> richard.chatter...@contegix.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> I was just reading through my backlog of messages and I see that the
>>> Realhostip.com service has been extended to September 30th. Hurray!
>>> 
>>> I also see the following in the message where that was announced:
>>> 
>>>> While testing Realhostip fixes additional product issues were found
>>> which are tracked in following three defects CLOUDSTACK-6499 [1],
>>> CLOUDSTACK-6599 [2], CLOUDSTACK-6824 [3] . These defects are fixed in
>>> 4.4 and master branch. Please verify in your setups. If you are on
>>> older version of CloudStack do plan on upgrading to 4.4 . Additional
>>> details on fixes are available in JIRA.  Updated wiki with steps will
>>> be published shortly.
>>> 
>>> Is it strictly necessary to upgrade CloudStack to 4.4 before migrating
>>> away from realhostip.com? Has anyone successfully migrated away from
>>> it on an older version of CloudStack?
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Rich Chatterton
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to