>From the logs 
2014-07-08 12:08:56,218 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] 
(AgentManager-Handler-1:null) Seq 1-277348416: Processing:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 
159320647860937, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details":"grep: 
/var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases: No such file or directory","wait":0}}] }

Can you check whether dnsmasq service is running in the Virtual Router ? if 
not, start the service and check for “/var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases”

-Harikrishna

On 08-Jul-2014, at 3:47 pm, Elliot Berg <elliot.b...@avcosystems.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've done that, and now there's a new virtual router which says it's running, 
> however a deployment still fails. My latest lot of logs are available at 
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz, and 
> there's now one thing in the op_it_work table with a step != 'Done', which is 
> a ConsoleProxy.
> 
> Interestingly if I look at the console proxy vm in the cloudstack management 
> gui it says it's running, though.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Elliot
> 
> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>> Yes mark the VR to stopped, destroy VR, mark the VR entry in op_it_work to 
>> “Done” and try deploying VM.
>> 
>> -Harikrishna
>> 
>> On 08-Jul-2014, at 12:44 pm, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> It appears to be stuck in the "starting" state - so I don't get the option 
>>> to reboot it or anything. If I change the state to stopped in the database 
>>> directly will the management server attempt to start it again or do I need 
>>> to do something more?
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Elliot
>>> 
>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>> Is your Virtual Router up and running ? If is in running state you can 
>>>> mark it Done and deploy a VM.
>>>> If it is in stopped state try restarting it. You can try updating the 
>>>> field as well.
>>>> 
>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>> 
>>>> On 07-Jul-2014, at 7:10 pm, Elliot Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>   
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I can see two entries that have the "step" field set to something other 
>>>>> than "Done", one of them is
>>>>> 
>>>>> ConsoleProxy | Starting
>>>>> 
>>>>> and the other is
>>>>> 
>>>>> DomainRouter | Prepare
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am I safe to just delete the rows, or should I just update the field?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Elliot
>>>>> 
>>>>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>>>>> Do you see any work item pending for Virtual Router r-4-VM in 
>>>>>> “op_it_work” table ?
>>>>>> If there are any, remove those entries and try VM deployment again.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I see in the logs that VR has a task pending
>>>>>> 2014-07-07 10:28:15,934 WARN  [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] 
>>>>>> (Job-Executor-5:job-48 = [ 22369802-b5aa-4b5a-a26d-1fab11241551 ]) The 
>>>>>> task item for vm VM[DomainRouter|r-4-VM] has been inactive for 418531
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Harikrishna
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 07-Jul-2014, at 2:18 pm, Elliot 
>>>>>> Berg<elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>>    
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm still not really spotting anything indicating why it's not using the 
>>>>>> host, but I suspect that's just because I don't really know what I'm 
>>>>>> looking for - so I've zipped the whole log for today and stuffed it on 
>>>>>> dropbox at 
>>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hopefully someone who's used cloudstack a lot more will have more 
>>>>>> success!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>> I'm going back over everything and I've noticed something else - 
>>>>>> everywhere I've looked for how to use local storage says I should change 
>>>>>> two global settings;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   *   system.vm.use.local.storage = true
>>>>>>   *   use.local.storage = true
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However I'm looking at my global settings and only the first exists 
>>>>>> (which I have set to true).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>> Ah, so when looking back a bit further before (I was kind of only 
>>>>>> looking for exceptions higher up before now), I've just spotted this...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] 
>>>>>> (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
>>>>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=1000Mhz, 
>>>>>> Ram=1024
>>>>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] 
>>>>>> (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
>>>>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: cloudstack-host1, 
>>>>>> hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and try
>>>>>> ing other available hosts
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's the one and only host - so I'm guessing that has something to do 
>>>>>> with it!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Elliot Berg  |  Analyst Programmer/Network Team
>>>>>> Email:  elliot.b...@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.b...@avcosystems.com>  
>>>>>>   | Tel: 01753 213700 | Web:  
>>>>>> www.avcosystems.com<http://www.avcosystems.com/>
>>>>>> <image.png>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Avco Systems Ltd, Registered in England&    Wales, Registration Number 
>>>>>> 1976620
>>>>>> Registered Office: Avco Systems | 17 Bath Road | Slough | SL1 3UF
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ilya musayev wrote:
>>>>>> Elliot,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> When you see such an error - there usually a predecessor message that 
>>>>>> says CloudStack checked for X, Y and Z and found no suitable resources 
>>>>>> based on your configuration.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Put the logs on pastebin or some other site (strip out any private info 
>>>>>> you dont want to share). I would also  recommend cloudstack 4.3.1 (which 
>>>>>> is not officially out yet) but should come thru in the next several 
>>>>>> weeks. Its latest stable release of CloudStack 4.3.0 - with latest bug 
>>>>>> fixes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've put a build for folks who want to try it out until we complete 
>>>>>> official release of ACS 4.3.1 process.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Unzip tgz and it should have required RPMs with both Open Source and 
>>>>>> Non-Open Source modules.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://www.cloudsand.com/cloudstack-4.3.0-1.tgz
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> ilya
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 7/2/14, 1:06 AM, Elliot Berg wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've been putting together a cloudstack set-up for experimentation 
>>>>>> purposes - right now we're just trying to compare different platforms 
>>>>>> for private cloud infrastructure before we start getting too in depth 
>>>>>> with any of them.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've added the cloudstack 4.2 apt repository, and I'm running on Ubuntu 
>>>>>> 12.04 LTS, and I believe I've followed all the installation guides 
>>>>>> correctly at the various stages.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We've set up a management server, which is also an NFS server, however 
>>>>>> we're interested in using local storage for the majority of things, and 
>>>>>> have also set up a single KVM host which I believe is all configured 
>>>>>> correctly to use local storage. If I look at the dashboard, I'm told I 
>>>>>> have more than enough resource in every section to create an instance 
>>>>>> the size I want to - which is a small offering I've created with just 
>>>>>> 1.0GHz and 1GB of RAM, with local storage. The host's not very powerful, 
>>>>>> but according to the dashboard I am using 1.50GHz/5.87GHz, 
>>>>>> 1.38GB/7.80GB, 3.55GB/285.95GB Secondary Storage, 1.03GB/450.99GB Local 
>>>>>> Storage and 0.00KB/571.90GB Primary Storage (I'm assuming that's meant 
>>>>>> to be a combination of the NFS server's primary storage offering and the 
>>>>>> local storage on the host, though the numbers don't quite make sense at 
>>>>>> first glance).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However, when I try to add an instance, I receive an 
>>>>>> InsufficientServerCapacityException and I'm struggling to work out why. 
>>>>>> I can't add an instance using a small shared storage offering either, 
>>>>>> but if I'm not mistaken that's expected because the zone and host are 
>>>>>> configured to use local storage. The only thing I can think of is that 
>>>>>> the local storage isn't properly configured, but when I've looked it 
>>>>>> seems to be.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any pointers for how I can further diagnose this would be great - thanks 
>>>>>> in advance!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Elliot
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to