Yes, that makes the ssvm-check pass all the tests. Thanks. Should I repeat that upgrade with the console proxy?
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Carlos Reategui <[email protected]> wrote: > There have been some messages going around about the template needing a fix > for this. > > Per this link (https://gist.github.com/terbolous/102ae8edd1cda192561c) > from > one of the messages you can try the following on the ssvm itself: > > apt-get update && apt-get -y install openjdk-7-jre-headless > openjdk-7-jre-lib && apt-get -y remove openjdk-6-jre-headless > > then you may also need to: > service cloud stop && sleep 3 && service cloud start > > try the ssvm-check again after that. > > My understanding is that this is not a permanent fix, but should get you > going for now. > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Ian Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I found this in the cloud.out log in the SSVM: > > > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: > > com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0 > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634) > > at > java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:277) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:73) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:212) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) > > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) > > Could not find the main class: com.cloud.agent.AgentShell. Program will > > exit. > > > > It seems to have to do with a Java version mismatch. I'm using JDK 7 on > > both the management server and hypervisor but the SSVM is using version > 6. > > Is this the most current system VM template? > > > > > > > http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Ian Young <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh > > > ================================================ > > > First DNS server is 192.168.100.2 > > > PING 192.168.100.2 (192.168.100.2): 48 data bytes > > > 56 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.227 ms > > > 56 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.882 ms > > > --- 192.168.100.2 ping statistics --- > > > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss > > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.882/1.054/1.227/0.173 ms > > > Good: Can ping DNS server > > > ================================================ > > > Good: DNS resolves download.cloud.com > > > ================================================ > > > ERROR: NFS is not currently mounted > > > Try manually mounting from inside the VM > > > NFS server is 169.254.1.0 > > > PING 169.254.1.0 (169.254.1.0): 48 data bytes > > > 56 bytes from 169.254.1.0: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.067 ms > > > 56 bytes from 169.254.1.0: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.039 ms > > > --- 169.254.1.0 ping statistics --- > > > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss > > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.039/0.053/0.067/0.000 ms > > > Good: Can ping nfs server > > > ================================================ > > > Management server is 192.168.101.3. Checking connectivity. > > > Good: Can connect to management server port 8250 > > > ================================================ > > > ERROR: Java process not running. Try restarting the SSVM. > > > > > > It says the NFS server is 169.254.1.0 which is the SSVM's link local > > > address. How did it decide that? During the zone configuration I > > > specified "virthost1.lax.ratespecial.com" as the NFS server and that > > > resolves to 192.168.101.4. Also, in what path does it expect the NFS > > > volume to be mounted? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Carlos Reategui <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> If the template is not ready then your ssvm may be having problems > > >> downloading it. Have you followed the info here: > > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting > > >> to make sure that the ssvm is actually working properly? > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Ian Young <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I've reinstalled CloudStack 4.4 again, configuring the network as > > >> follows: > > >> > > > >> > management server: > > >> > p4p1 http://pastebin.com/skMXxVtk > > >> > > > >> > hypervisor/storage server: > > >> > eth0 http://pastebin.com/LxUxFdpe > > >> > eth1 http://pastebin.com/K5si1L4d > > >> > cloudbr0 http://pastebin.com/heZGQfVs (management/storage traffic) > > >> > cloudbr1 http://pastebin.com/nprB2Kx7 (guest traffic) > > >> > > > >> > When I logged into the management GUI for the first time, I skipped > > the > > >> > wizard and went straight to the dashboard. There, I set up a basic > > >> zone as > > >> > follows: > > >> > > > >> > http://imgur.com/a/R1dX0#0 > > >> > > > >> > Now that the infrastructure has been launched and the SSVM and > console > > >> > proxy are running, I noticed that the CentOS template is not ready. > > >> > Neither the management server or the hypervisor are downloading > > >> anything, > > >> > so it doesn't appear the CentOS template will be ready. If I try to > > >> > register my own templates, I fill out all the fields but the window > > just > > >> > disappears when I click OK and no template is added. I don't see > any > > >> new > > >> > messages in the management server log at the time this occurs. I > > >> suspect > > >> > there is a storage problem. However, I can mount the NFS shares > onto > > >> the > > >> > management server with no problems. That's how I was able to > manually > > >> > download the system VM template, as the installation guide > indicated. > > >> > What's wrong with this setup? I don't see any obvious errors in > the > > >> > management log besides these repetitive messages, which seem to > > >> contradict > > >> > the fact that there is a SSVM and console proxy running: > > >> > > > >> > http://pastebin.com/yvW5GmSB > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
