Am Dienstag, den 04.11.2014, 09:07 +0200 schrieb Vladimir Melnik: > Dear colleagues, > > Did anyone compare CephFS and GFS2 or did anyone read any articles about > comparison of CephFS and GFS2 in regard to their performance? Alas, I > haven't found anything on this topic. > > Right now I'm using GFS2 as a primary storage filesystem (it's > accessible by iSCSI+multipath), but, of course, I'd like to gain more > performance. Should I try CephFS as an alternative?
Both techniques are quite different. In short, you shouldn't use CephFS in favor of ceph's native RBD. I'll try to follow up later that day - currently in a hurry. > > Thanks! >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
