Did you check if the agent is running on SSVM? This wiki might help. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
~Rajani On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Dan Dong <dongda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some more info, on SSVM I can see the following routes, there is route > there, so why SSVM(eth2: 192.168.0.134) could not contact Management > Server(192.168.0.100)? Can someone help here? Thanks > root@s-1-VM:~# ip route > default via 192.168.0.100 dev eth2 > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47 > 172.20.10.0/24 via 192.168.0.100 dev eth1 > 172.20.10.30 via 192.168.0.100 dev eth1 > 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22 > 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.134 > 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.25 > > > 2014-11-10 15:12 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong <dongda...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi, All, > > When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I > > logged into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although > > they are both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping > > outside world. Here are my simple network settings of my > cloud(1Management > > Server + 1 KVM hypervisor): > > > > 1. Management server have 2 NICs: > > em2 pointing outside with 10.0.0.100/24 > > em1 pointing inside with 192.168.0.100/24 (also serves as DNS > > and Gateway of the cloud) > > 2. One KVM hypervisor which has 1 NIC: em1 with 192.168.0.101/24 > > 3. VMs created on KVM hypervisor will sit on the same network of > > 192.168.0.0/24 > > > > The weird thing is that I can access the internet from the KVM hypervisor > > as NAT is enabled on the Management Server, but for the SSVM(IP of eth2: > > 192.168.0.89) running on it, it could not even see the Management > > Server(192.168.0.100 on em1). Should one manually re-configure routing > > tables on the SSVM to solve this problem or it is caused by the initial > > network design of the cloud? Thanks! > > > > Cheers, > > Dan > > > > >