Hi, All, Can experts examine the settings above if they are problematic? Could Management Server, KVM host and VMs all sit in the same 192.168.0.0/24 network? I checked a lot but have no idea, all firewalls have been turned off but still the SSVM could not contact Management server and the outside. Thanks a lot!
Cheers, Dan 2014-11-11 10:29 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong <dongda...@gmail.com>: > Hi, All, > When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following > route table on SSVM: > root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47 > 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22 > 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.134 > 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.25 > > There are 3 rules to reach the same subnet of 192.168.0.0/24 through > different NICs. > The problem is that SSVM could not ping both the KVM host(192.168.0.101) > on which the SSVM is running and the Management Server(192.168.0.100, it is > also set to be the gateway of the 192.168.0.0/24 network), although they > are all on the same subnet. I suspect it is the bridge setings of the KVM, > but no clues yet. Any hints? > > root@comp11:/etc# cat /etc/network/interfaces > # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system > # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). > > # The loopback network interface > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > # The primary network interface > auto em1 > iface em1 inet static > address 192.168.0.101 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > network 192.168.0.0 > broadcast 192.168.0.255 > gateway 192.168.0.100 > dns-nameservers 192.168.0.100 > > #=============CloudStack Network Bridges============ > # Public network > auto cloudbr0 > iface cloudbr0 inet manual > bridge_ports em1.200 > bridge_fd 5 > bridge_stp off > bridge_maxwait 1 > > # Private network > auto cloudbr1 > iface cloudbr1 inet manual > bridge_ports em1.300 > bridge_fd 5 > bridge_stp off > bridge_maxwait 1 > > > Cheers, > Dan >