Hi, my instinct says it won't work, but there shouldn't be any harm in trying. IIRC some settings like this have to be >= 1. However, the storage disable thresholds seem more appropriate for this scenario. You can set it at various levels (global, zone, cluster) depending on your exact needs.
Best regards, Kirk On 12/02/2014 12:36 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: > true... ZFS pool under NFS...will consider...but I;'m just wondering, since > it is math of available space = overprovisioningFactor x realspace - I > guess this is technicaly possible... > > On 2 December 2014 at 09:34, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > >> I think your approaching this from the wrong side. >> Why not just nfs export half of the space instead? (you could use lvm, >> thin-lvm etc)? >> >> Lucian >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> >>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org, d...@cloudstack.apache.org >>> Sent: Tuesday, 2 December, 2014 07:53:37 >>> Subject: NFS overprovisioning of 0.5 ??? >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> wondering if it is possible to set overprovisioning factor to less than >> 1 ? >>> >>> I have 1 NFS box, 2 x 10GB cards inside, don't want to do bonding, but >>> efectively present this single box as 2 boxes via 2 IP adresses - so in >>> this scenario I need to set overprovisioning factor to less than 1, to >> i.e. >>> 0.5 - because of disk space etc... >>> >>> This is for test purposes, but again... >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Andrija Panić >> > > >
