Yes, I'm also seeing this on DELL PE R720... It seems like a libvirt fail, try to submit a bug upstream (redhat bugzilla).
Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Abdul Rasool" <rasool...@gmail.com> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, 31 December, 2014 07:49:37 > Subject: Re: CPU socket miss match !!! Urgent > Hi Harikrishna, > > Thanks for your reply > > Here is the command out put. > > root@cloud-node001:~# dmidecode -t 4 |grep Socket > Socket Designation: CPU1 > Upgrade: Socket LGA2011 > Socket Designation: CPU2 > Upgrade: Socket LGA2011 > > > root@cloud-node001:~# virsh nodeinfo > CPU model: x86_64 > CPU(s): 8 > CPU frequency: 2500 MHz > CPU socket(s): 1 > Core(s) per socket: 4 > Thread(s) per core: 1 > NUMA cell(s): 2 > Memory size: 32899468 kB > > When I check using dmidecode I am getting actual CPU sockets =2 whereas > libvirt is picking only one socket. please help me to fix this issue. > > Thanks > AR > > > > On 31 December 2014 at 11:27, Harikrishna Patnala < > harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> This seems to me like a libvirt issue on KVM. >> We read the socket count from the parameter ‘sockets’ in NodeInfo on KVM >> host. >> Can you check with the command “virsh nodeinfo” ? >> >> Thanks, >> Harikrishna >> >> >> On 31-Dec-2014, at 9:54 am, Abdul Rasool <rasool...@gmail.com<mailto: >> rasool...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Attachment is missing ... added the same. >> >> On 31 December 2014 at 09:50, Abdul Rasool <rasool...@gmail.com<mailto: >> rasool...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In my test / dev environment I have total 2 Dell Poweredge M620 blade >> servers configured as KVM hypervisor each has physical CPU of 2 sockets, >> total number of CPU sockets available in my setup is 4 sockets. but in ACS >> infrastructure shows only 2 physical sockets. for your reference I have >> attached my infrastructure screenshot. >> >> could you please some one help me why ACS is showing only 2 CPU sockets >> instead of 4 ? is there any configuration issue from my side. ? right now >> this environment is used for our internal development purpose due to CPU >> mismatch I am not able to add additional guest VM in my infrastructure it >> is throwing me insufficient resources.......! >> >> [Inline images 1] >> >> Regards, >> AR >> >> >>
