Daniel,
Management traffic only communicate with each other and it can be tried to
create SSVM and secondary storeage, etc., You may check with management
subnet range.
Thank You.
Gopalakrishnan.S
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Kollmer" <daniel.koll...@tomtom.com>
To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Secondary Storage VM & Console Proxy creation failure
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello and thank you for your replies.
Allow me to address them individually.
On 03/06/2015 10:34 AM, Partha Goswami wrote:
just keep basic default networking and try i had same issue solved
that way
Hello Partha
May I ask you to elaborate what you mean by that. Which kind of
default networking I would have to use?
On 03/06/2015 10:50 AM, Timothy Lothering wrote:
I suggest you have a look further in the logs, the "
InsufficientServerCapacityException" usually indicates that the
server you are trying to provision to does not meet your templates
requirements. There are 2 parts to this and I will explain by way
of an example:
You have a 2 Socket, 16 Core Server with 64GB RAM, the server
cores are rated at 2.0GHz, if you have a template which has been
defined
as > 2.0GHz, theoretically, this should work, but if you look at what the
Host system says is available (i.e. 1999MHz), the server will be
deemed as having insufficient capacity.
With this said, have you modified the default service offering for
your Console Proxy and/or Secondary storage? Also, I suggest you
look to see if the Host is in maintenance Mode. Logs will be your
best bet
Hi Timothy
Everything is "out-of-the-box" and unmodified. The hypervisor host is
up and in the agent logs there is nothing that indicates any warnings.
At this time I only have the default "small" and "medium" service
offerings which are way below system specs albeit the CPU frequency is
indeed not the same as what the system offers (it is lower) should it
be the same?
On 03/06/2015 11:48 AM, Gopalakrishnan S wrote:
Your server have enough capacity but cloudstack server error
indicates that your cluster and pod load as null value. My
suggestion is you should recheck your management traffic ip
configuration. Is that ips are communicate properly ?
Please make sure your management traffic ip cofiguration in
cloudstack zone ->pod settings.
Hello Gopalakrishnan
Do you mean I should make sure the hypervisor host can communicate
with the management server and vice versa? That is definitely the
case, otherwise I would not be able to see the host in my
infrastructure overview, right?
They are on different subnets though which also have different VLANS,
is there something I need to set there?
Kind regards and thanks for your feedback everyone.
- --
Daniel Kollmer | Sr. System Engineer - OTS |
daniel.koll...@tomtom.com | Phone: +31 20 75 75 084 | Mobile: +31
(0)6 29 13 96 47
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=nEUw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
