This would be a great bug to file... that way developers can get this
addressed. File here:
https://issues.apache.org/

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Rene Moser <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> We experienced packet drops and high CPU on one core (only) on a
> multicore VR on high volume traffic.
>
> After extensive investigation, we identified the irq balancing is not
> working properly, as a result only one core was used for IRQ handing of
> TCP for all 3 interfaces:
>
> # cat /proc/interrupts
>             CPU0    CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
>   72: 2704675402    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth0-rxtx-0
>   73: 1272554833    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth0-rxtx-1
>   74: 1277628455    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth0-rxtx-2
>   75: 1278457419    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth0-rxtx-3
>   76:          0    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth0-event-4
>   77:     450819    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth1-rxtx-0
>   78:     370442    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth1-rxtx-1
>   79:     317069    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth1-rxtx-2
>   80:     401197    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth1-rxtx-3
>   81:          0    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth1-event-4
>   82: 2768559207    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth2-rxtx-0
>   83: 1328122336    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth2-rxtx-1
>   84: 1328017908    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge  eth2-rxtx-2
>   85: 1322146180    0    0    0   PCI-MSI-edge
>
> Restarting /etc/init.d/ircbalance did not help, but you will find some
> log entries in /var/log/daemon.log
>
> irqbalance: WARNING: MSI interrupts found in /proc/interrupts
> irqbalance: But none found in sysfs, you need to update your kernel
> irqbalance: Until then, IRQs will be improperly classified
>
> It turns out, this is a known issue on Debian Wheezy irqbalance version
> 1.0.3-3 https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/05/msg00512.html and
> was patched in 1.0.4-1.
>
> But the good know is, there is 1.0.6 in wheezy-backports
>
> aptitude update
> aptitude install -t wheezy-backports irqbalance
>
> That helped.
>
> Can this be included in the SystemVM templates as well?
>
> Yours
> René
>
>
>

Reply via email to