I've cheked my xensource.log and i have no trace of the issue(i keep
looking  ,my bond is on Active/Active. All my bonds are configured  on two
PIF that are connected to two switches thats why we are not using lacp.

 Thx

2015-04-11 23:00 GMT+01:00 Sam Ceylani <s...@mistercertified.com>:

> adding or removing a vm shouldn't affect management bond status unless
> when cloudstack makes an API call to xen toolstack for adding or removing
> vm somehow xenserver's management interface is bounced with that API call,
> I would check xenserver logs under /var/log and you can determine the
> reason, i doubt  it is related to cloudstack, it could also be a
> spanning-tree or lacp issue, check switch logs to determine if any of those
> sub systems on the switch causing this issue...what kind of bond is this?
> how is it configured on the switch,is it lacp or not basically?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sam Ceylani, MBA
> Computer Engineer
> MisterCertified Inc.
>
> 301 W. Platt St. Suite 447, Tampa, FL 33606<x-apple-data-detectors://0/0>
> P 813<tel:813.264.6460>.264.6460<tel:813.264.6460> M
> 813<tel:813.416.7867>.416.7867<tel:813.416.7867>
> F 800<tel:800.553.9520>.553.9520<tel:800.553.9520> E
> sam.ceyl...@mistercertified.com<mailto:sam.ceyl...@mistercertified.com>
>
> On Apr 11, 2015, at 5:52 PM, "Fedi Ben Ali" <ben.ali.fe...@gmail.com
> <mailto:ben.ali.fe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello ,
>
>
> I'm working on a platform with many xenservers ,i'm using bonded interfaces
> for all the required cloudstack networks (management,guest,storage,public).
>
> All my networks works fine except the public network ,each time i add or
> remove VM from a cluster ,the xenserver log shows" the status of the bond
> has changed ".
>
> Did i miss some configuration ??
>
>
> i 'll give my log output :
>
> WB5: Bond status has changed,"3","The status of the eth2+eth3+eth4 bond
> changed: 0/3 up (was 3/3)"    WB5: Bond status has changed,"3","The status
> of the eth2+eth3+eth4 bond changed: 3/3 up (was 0/3)"
>  WB1: Bond status has changed,"3","The status of the eth5+eth6+eth7 bond
> changed: 0/3 up (was 3/3)","
>

Reply via email to