After upgrade we have a serious problem with VR for shared guest network. It seem everything is working OK, but after a while we got these errors on system console:
Domain routerCommand: com.cloud.agent.api.Command failed while ...25 May 2015 16:58:08 Domain routerUnable to restart r-30-VM which was running on hos...availability zone: ZoneX: Pod 1 After VR restart everything goes back for a while (~ 3-4 min) and then problem comes back. VR is slow. Logging into VR from host for troubleshooting takes around 30 sec. All the VM-s in guest network are also slow because of the network. Network restart has failed. VR restart does not give anything. Inside VR even simple tasks like "ps ax" or "top" take seconds. Do you have any ideas why that can happen? Vadim. -----Original Message----- From: Jan-Arve Nygård [mailto:jan.arve.nyg...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 1:05 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Compatibility of CS 4.5.1 with XenServer 6.5 SP1 We have tested upgrading to XS 6.5 SP1 with CloudStack 4.5.1 and we didn't run into any issues. We tested the following without any problems: Start of existing VM Deploy VM Destroy VM Attach ISO Detach ISO Snapshot of VM Live migration of VM to another host Storage migration to another SR Add NIC Remove NIC And probably some other stuff that i don't remember right now. -thinktwo 2015-05-20 21:17 GMT+02:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk <vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee>: > I am planning to do it within a couple of days. Will let you know > > Vadim. > ________________________________________ > From: Jan-Arve Nygård <jan.arve.nyg...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 15:38 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Compatibility of CS 4.5.1 with XenServer 6.5 SP1 > > I guess it wouldn't be a problem, but I'm also interested if someone > has tested and verified this yet. > > 2015-05-19 14:57 GMT+02:00 Ian Service <iserv...@ts2.ca>: > > > The release notes for CS 4.5.1 don't specifically list XenServer 6.5 > > SP1 compatibility, likely because they overlapped in release > > timelines. Are there any compatibility concerns between the two latest > > versions of each? > > > > Thanks, > > > > - Ian > > >