That does not brake entire logic :) Vadim.
-----Original Message----- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 11:24 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Cloudstack physical network on xenserver Hi Vadim, That depends on your upstream provider. In our case, we get a VLAN from upstream provider and send tagged packets (they take care of it from there). So, in that case the VLAN tagging is handy/required. If you need to send it untagged, then tagging it wont’t work indeed. Regards, Remi > On 3 jul. 2015, at 09:08, Vadim Kimlaychuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Fedi, > > Public traffic must me "untagged" because the next switch after yours > will not recognize it if it is tagged. You need to untag public traffic > before sending out. To route internally - you need to tag it. I also have > public traffic tagged internally and assign tag on ingress and remove tag on > egress traffic. This is done by switch configuration. > > VLAN is used for isolation. You can have same ip ranges on the same > physical networks without networks to be overlapped. > > Vadim. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fedi Ben Ali [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 5:32 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Cloudstack physical network on xenserver > > Hello, > > On my deploiement cloudstack 4.4 and xenservers 6.2. i have configured > multiple networks each one for a specific traffic type > (Public,management,storage,guest). > > these networks are isolated and vlan tagged ,so on my xenservers i have the > 4 networks each with a specific name label and pointing to a Vlan. > > when i added the public ip range ,i did not mention the VLAN number of my > public network. > > Can this cause issues or not ? > > and what is the pupose of putting the vlan number on the ip ranges ? > > Thx.
