Hey, thanks for your comments.

Yeah I understand but the question is can the Vrouter establish the connection 
or do I need that the other side sends traffic to stablish the tunnel.

thanks



Cordialmente,

Yesid Mora | Orchestration Engineer | O4IT
PBX: 251 Ext +57 (1) 423-5460 | Cel: 3124509565
Cr. 7 #74-56 | Oficina 202 | Bogotá, Colombia
http://www.o4it.com | mailto:ym...@o4it.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Weller [mailto:swel...@ena.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 8:42 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack - Virtual Router

Have you got a box at the other end where you could place a ping script in cron 
and time it for every minute to ping across the tunnel?


________________________________________
From: Yesid Mora <ym...@o4it.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 2:13 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: CloudStack - Virtual Router

Sorry , the problem that we are having it's that in order to establish the vpn 
tunnel between the networks the cisco side needs to send traffic to the private 
IP behind the VR. Cause the VPN is up but traffic it's not passing till the 
cisco side send the first packet.

I believe that the keep-alive on cisco side it's just for the VPN to establish 
not for the Phase II network traffic to pass.

Thanks.



Cordialmente,

Yesid Mora | Orchestration Engineer | O4IT
PBX: 251 Ext +57 (1) 423-5460 | Cel: 3124509565 Cr. 7 #74-56 | Oficina 202 | 
Bogotá, Colombia http://www.o4it.com | mailto:ym...@o4it.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Weller [mailto:swel...@ena.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:01 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack - Virtual Router

You could set a periodic keep-alive on the cisco side.


Try something like this:

crypro isakmp keepalive 10 5 periodic

- Si


________________________________
From: Yesid Mora <ym...@o4it.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:44 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack - Virtual Router


Hello guys,



I'm having a problem with a IPSEC vpn between a Cisco and my Virtual router, 
cause in order to start the traffic on the tunnel the Cisco side needs to send 
traffic first to my site and then I can ping the Cisco site,



Something like this.



Virtual router site IP 10.10.20.0/24



Cisco site IP 10.10.30.0/24



So the tunnel is up but in order to pass traffic first the cisco site needs to 
send a ping to my site after that the tunnel works just perfect.



Thanks.





Cordialmente / Best regards,





Yesid Mora | Orchestration Engineer | O4IT


PBX:+57 (1) 423-5460  Ext  251  | Cel: 3124509565


Cr. 7 #74-56 | Oficina 202 | Bogotá, Colombia


www.o4it.com<http://www.o4it.com>

[http://o4it.com/wp-content/uploads/featured-slider-1.jpg]<http://www.o4it.com/>

O4IT - THE CLOUD ENABLER<http://www.o4it.com/> www.o4it.com We are a leading 
provider of Cloud Technologies, focused on providing the technology and best 
practices to enable channel partners and resellers to quickly deliver ...


 | ym...@o4it.com<mailto:ym...@o4it.com>





[http://www.o4it.com]<http://www.o4it.com>[http://www.linkedin.com/company/1207504]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/1207504>[https://twitter.com/o4it]<https://twitter.com/o4it>[https://www.facebook.com/o4itofficial]<https://www.facebook.com/o4itofficial>[https://www.youtube.com/user/o4itofficial]<https://www.youtube.com/user/o4itofficial>




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.







Reply via email to