Thank you, i'm thinking something like that too.....
Pagarbiai Mindaugas Milinavičius UAB STARNITA Direktorius http://www.clustspace.com LT: +37068882880 RU: +79651806396 Tomorrow's posibilities today <http://www.clustspace.com/> - 1 Core, 512MB RAM, 20GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 11EUR - 1 Core, 1024MB RAM, 30GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 18,7EUR - 2 Cores, 2048MB RAM, 40GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 27,5EUR - 4 Cores, 4096MB RAM, 100GB SSD, 1Gbps, Unlimited, Location: Romania, Los Angeles, Ashburn Washington - 46EUR On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Stavros Konstantaras <s.konstanta...@uva.nl > wrote: > In our case (general purpose VMs) we decided to have the system's RAM as > the reference point to create our VM limit. For example, if the server has > 128GBs of RAM and the default VM profile is 1 vCPU + 4Gbs RAM, then our > upper limit is roughly 30VMs per server. > > Over provisioning the CPU is usually not a problem but over provisioning > the RAM can be the start of many problems . > > Kind Regards > Stavros > > ---------------------------- > Stavros Konstantaras > Science faculty Research IT support (FEIOG) > University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH > > Fingerprint: E5E5 9B19 D1CD 88CD 4763 3465 A8DC 7C92 330F D59A > > > On 11 Apr 2016, at 13:09, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Mindaugas Milinavičius < > > mindau...@clustspace.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> how many VM's do you creating per host? > >> What you prefer E5-2650v3 or E5-2630v3 (less power, 2x cheaper CPU, and > >> only ±20% less benchmark) > >> > >> > > I'd say it depends on the workload. For generic purpose VMs CPU is > usually > > not the bottleneck and personally I'd pick the cheaper one. > > > > You should look into v4 CPUs while at it. > > > > -- > > Erik > >
