I'm not sure if the expunge interval/delay plays a part... but you might want to set: storage.cleanup.enabled to false. That might prevent your disks from being purged. You might also look to export those volumes, or copy them to a safe location, out of band.
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Yiping Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > Before I try the direct DB modifications, I would first: > > * shutdown the VM instances > * stop cloudstack-management service > * do a DB backup with mysqldump > > What I worry the most is that the volumes on new cluster’s primary storage > device are marked as “removed”, so if I shutdown the instances, the > cloudstack may kick off a storage cleanup job to remove them from new > cluster’s primary storage before I can get the fixes in. > > Is there a way to temporarily disable storage cleanups ? > > Yiping > > > > > On 5/4/16, 3:22 PM, "Yiping Zhang" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi, all: > > > >I am in a situation that I need some help: > > > >I did a live migration with storage migration required for a production > VM instance from one cluster to another. The first migration attempt > failed after some time, but the second attempt succeeded. During all this > time the VM instance is accessible (and it is still up and running). > However, when I use my api script to query volumes, it still reports that > the volume is on the old cluster’s primary storage. If I shut down this > VM, I am afraid that it won’t start again as it would try to use > non-existing volumes. > > > >Checking database, sure enough, the DB still has old info about these > volumes: > > > > > >mysql> select id,name from storage_pool where id=1 or id=8; > > > >+----+------------------+ > > > >| id | name | > > > >+----+------------------+ > > > >| 1 | abprod-primary1 | > > > >| 8 | abprod-p1c2-pri1 | > > > >+----+------------------+ > > > >2 rows in set (0.01 sec) > > > > > >Here the old cluster’s primary storage has id=1, and the new cluster’s > primary storage has id=8. > > > > > >Here are the entries with wrong info in volumes table: > > > > > >mysql> select id,name, uuid, path,pool_id, removed from volumes where > name='ROOT-97' or name='DATA-97'; > > > > >+-----+---------+--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+---------+---------------------+ > > > >| id | name | uuid | path > | pool_id | removed | > > > > >+-----+---------+--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+---------+---------------------+ > > > >| 124 | ROOT-97 | 224bf673-fda8-4ccc-9c30-fd1068aee005 | > 5d1ab4ef-2629-4384-a56a-e2dc1055d032 | 1 | NULL | > > > >| 125 | DATA-97 | d385d635-9230-4130-8d1f-702dbcf0f22c | > 6b75496d-5907-46c3-8836-5618f11dac8e | 1 | NULL | > > > >| 316 | ROOT-97 | 691b5c12-7ec4-408d-b66f-1ff041f149c1 | NULL > | 8 | 2016-05-03 06:10:40 | > > > >| 317 | ROOT-97 | 8ba29fcf-a81a-4ca0-9540-0287230f10c7 | NULL > | 8 | 2016-05-03 06:10:45 | > > > > >+-----+---------+--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+---------+---------------------+ > > > >4 rows in set (0.01 sec) > > > >On the xenserver of old cluster, the volumes do not exist: > > > > > >[root@abmpc-hv01 ~]# xe vdi-list name-label='ROOT-97' > > > >[root@abmpc-hv01 ~]# xe vdi-list name-label='DATA-97' > > > >[root@abmpc-hv01 ~]# > > > >But the volumes are on the new cluster’s primary storage: > > > > > >[root@abmpc-hv04 ~]# xe vdi-list name-label=ROOT-97 > > > >uuid ( RO) : a253b217-8cdc-4d4a-a111-e5b6ad48a1d5 > > > > name-label ( RW): ROOT-97 > > > > name-description ( RW): > > > > sr-uuid ( RO): 6d4bea51-f253-3b43-2f2f-6d7ba3261ed3 > > > > virtual-size ( RO): 34359738368 > > > > sharable ( RO): false > > > > read-only ( RO): true > > > > > >uuid ( RO) : c46b7a61-9e82-4ea1-88ca-692cd4a9204b > > > > name-label ( RW): ROOT-97 > > > > name-description ( RW): > > > > sr-uuid ( RO): 6d4bea51-f253-3b43-2f2f-6d7ba3261ed3 > > > > virtual-size ( RO): 34359738368 > > > > sharable ( RO): false > > > > read-only ( RO): false > > > > > >[root@abmpc-hv04 ~]# xe vdi-list name-label=DATA-97 > > > >uuid ( RO) : bc868e3d-b3c0-4c6a-a6fc-910bc4dd1722 > > > > name-label ( RW): DATA-97 > > > > name-description ( RW): > > > > sr-uuid ( RO): 6d4bea51-f253-3b43-2f2f-6d7ba3261ed3 > > > > virtual-size ( RO): 107374182400 > > > > sharable ( RO): false > > > > read-only ( RO): false > > > > > >uuid ( RO) : a8c187cc-2ba0-4928-8acf-2afc012c036c > > > > name-label ( RW): DATA-97 > > > > name-description ( RW): > > > > sr-uuid ( RO): 6d4bea51-f253-3b43-2f2f-6d7ba3261ed3 > > > > virtual-size ( RO): 107374182400 > > > > sharable ( RO): false > > > > read-only ( RO): true > > > > > >Following is how I plan to fix the corrupted DB entries. Note: using uuid > of VDI volume with read/write access as the path values: > > > > > >1. for ROOT-97 volume: > > > >Update volumes set removed=NOW() where id=124; > >Update volumes set removed=NULL where id=317; > >Update volumes set path=c46b7a61-9e82-4ea1-88ca-692cd4a9204b where id=317; > > > > > >2) for DATA-97 volume: > > > >Update volumes set pool_id=8 where id=125; > > > >Update volumes set path=bc868e3d-b3c0-4c6a-a6fc-910bc4dd1722 where id=125; > > > > > >Would this work? > > > > > >Thanks for all the helps anyone can provide. I have a total of 4 VM > instances with 8 volumes in this situation need to be fixed. > > > > > >Yiping >
