Hi Sam,

Thanks for your reply.

Connection to MS is OK, since SSVM works fine. Problem seems to be isolated
to the VR. I am using KVM hypervisor. Testing the upgrade again now and
will update the result.

Cheers.

-ip-


On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Sam Ceylani <s...@mistercertified.com>
wrote:

> So check your firewall on your management server, test that connection. I
> believe there are some new stuff introduced
> that changed how routers and system vms connect to MS. But you said SSVM
> connects fine right? What Hypervisor are you using?
> Because I believe they changed system vm connections to ssh on xen for
> system vms etc. and there was even a port number that I know
> I put in to my firewall which wasn’t there before...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cloud List [mailto:cloud-l...@sg.or.id]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 12:37 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrading from ACS 4.2 to 4.8 - VR upgrade issue
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> My SSVM and CPVM seems to work fine -- although I can't verify if they are
> really using the new template or not, but my VR doesn't work even after I
> destroy the VR and restart the network with clean-up option. So the VR is
> never able to be started up after the upgrade. It kept on "Starting" state
> and agent.log file shows it keeps on trying to connect to the link local IP
> but never able to connect.
>
> I tested the upgrade on a staging environment with just 1 VR, I have
> reverted back the setup to 4.2 and now re-doing the upgrade again for the
> second attempt, will see if it works. My production has around 10+ networks
> so I need to ensure this works before I initiate the upgrade on my
> production server.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Sam Ceylani <s...@mistercertified.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Same thing happened to me, upgrading from 4.5.2 to 4.8 and I had to
> > restart network with clean-up option checked for each network which
> > rebuilds the router VM. If your SSVM works And if you can test it then
> > I don’t see any problem rebuilding network(router vm) with new
> > template which took about 30 minutes for about
> > 20 networks in total...may not be an option for large
> > installations...how many routers you are running?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cloud List [mailto:cloud-l...@sg.or.id]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 12:23 AM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Upgrading from ACS 4.2 to 4.8 - VR upgrade issue
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Could it be the VR is not able to use the new systemVM template
> > because we registered the template as Routing = NO? Will it resolve
> > the problem if during upgrade, we register the template as Routing = YES?
> >
> > Based on the upgrade instruction at
> >
> > http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.io/ja/stable/upgrade/upgra
> > de-4.2.html , it says that routing option should be "no", is this
> > correct? Since the systemVM template will also be used by VR?
> >
> > Any advice is appreciated.
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > -ip-
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Cloud List <cloud-l...@sg.or.id> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Kirk,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply.
> > >
> > > Here's the status of the CPVM and SSVM in the UI:
> > >
> > > Name    v-2-VM
> > > ID    fc6d23bf-58ac-4641-af9b-506d1dc46df3
> > > State    Running
> > > Type    Console Proxy VM
> > > Zone    sc-test-cs42-zone
> > > Public IP Address    192.168.0.162
> > > Private IP Address    192.168.0.160
> > > Link Local IP Address    169.254.3.147
> > > Host    sc-test-kvm-03
> > > Gateway    192.168.0.1
> > > Created    31 May 2016 15:24:20
> > > Active Sessions    0
> > >
> > > Name    s-29-VM
> > > ID    d26f54f8-1c1f-4f3d-9862-fc0405159620
> > > State    Running
> > > Type    Secondary Storage VM
> > > Zone    sc-test-cs42-zone
> > > Public IP Address    192.168.0.161
> > > Private IP Address    192.168.0.151
> > > Link Local IP Address    169.254.1.207
> > > Host    sc-test-kvm-03
> > > Gateway    192.168.0.1
> > > Created    06 Jun 2016 00:31:04
> > > Active Sessions
> > >
> > > Both system VMs seem to be on "Running" state but I can't verify
> > > what template version they are using, whether they are already on
> > > 4.6/4.8 template or still using 4.2 template, are you able to advise
> > > how can I tell? The SSVM creation date seem to be after we performed
> > > the upgrade but the CPVM created date is before the upgrade.
> > >
> > > How to ensure that all systemVMs using the new version template?
> > > Shall I destroy the system VMs so new ones will be created, or shall
> > > I re-run the /usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm again in full?
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > > -ip-
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Kirk Kosinski
> > > <kirk.kosin...@shapeblue.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, what is the status of the CPVM and SSVM in the UI?  Were they
> > >> really upgraded successfully?
> > >>
> > >> Also, are there any errors in the management-server.log?
> > >>
> > >> kirk.kosin...@shapeblue.com
> > >> www.shapeblue.com
> > >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HS @shapeblue
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Cloud List [mailto:cloud-l...@sg.or.id]
> > >> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 9:51 AM
> > >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Upgrading from ACS 4.2 to 4.8 - VR upgrade issue
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I tried upgrading our CloudStack 4.2.0 on our test environment to
> > >> 4.8.0, and I am having issues on VR upgrade. I followed the upgrade
> > instructions
> > >> at below URL:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.io/ja/stable/upgrade/upgra
> > de-4.2.html
> > >>
> > >> On the last step to restart all the system VMs and VRs, it seems
> > >> that
> > the
> > >> cloudstack-sysvmadm script managed to restart the system VMs (SSVM
> > >> and
> > >> CPVM) but not the VR.
> > >>
> > >> # nohup cloudstack-sysvmadm -d IPaddress -u cloud -p password -a >
> > >> sysvm.log 2>&1 &
> > >>
> > >> Here's the output of the sysvm.log file:
> > >>
> > >> ====
> > >> nohup: ignoring input
> > >> /usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions:
> > >> No such file or directory
> > >>
> > >> Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
> > >> Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
> > >>
> > >> Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
> > >> Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
> > >>
> > >> Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
> > >> *ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id 5*
> > >>
> > >> Done restarting router(s).
> > >> ====
> > >>
> > >> Output of the cloud.log file:
> > >>
> > >> ====
> > >> [2016.06.05-22.28.40] Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage
> vm(s)...
> > >> [2016.06.05-22.28.40] INFO: Stopping secondary storage vm with id 3
> > >> [2016.06.05-22.28.46] INFO: Starting secondary storage vm with id 3
> > >> [2016.06.05-23.29.00] ERROR: Failed to startSystemVm id=3; jobId is
> > >> 121c5d89-745a-4e8e-9f96-0b348ef42abf
> > >> [2016.06.05-23.29.00] ERROR: Failed to start secondary storage vm
> > >> with
> > id
> > >> 3 [2016.06.05-23.29.00] ERROR: Failed to start secondary storage vm
> > with id
> > >> 3 [2016.06.05-23.29.00] Done stopping and starting secondary
> > >> storage
> > vm(s).
> > >> [2016.06.05-23.29.00] Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
> > >> [2016.06.05-23.29.00] INFO: Stopping console proxy with id 2
> > >> [2016.06.05-23.29.06] INFO: Starting console proxy vm with id 2
> > >> [2016.06.05-23.30.49] Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
> > >> [2016.06.05-23.30.49] Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
> > >> [2016.06.05-23.30.49] INFO: Restarting router with id 5
> > >> [2016.06.06-00.30.59] ERROR: Failed to restart domainRouter with id
> > >> 5; jobId 4a3f681e-c4a6-4856-9d42-0d3b79bffdae
> > >> [2016.06.06-00.31.04] Done restarting router(s).
> > >> ====
> > >>
> > >> Initially I noted that the VR remains in 4.2.0 version (instead of
> > >> the expected 4.8.0 version), tried to destroy the router so it'll
> > >> be
> > recreated
> > >> but it doesn't get created successfully.
> > >>
> > >> Tried to run the cloudstack-sysvmadm manually with the -r option to
> > >> restart only the VR, and the problem still persists.
> > >>
> > >> At the moment, the version of the VR is "UNKNOWN" and the "Require
> > >> Upgrade"
> > >> state is "Yes".
> > >>
> > >> Any advice how to make the VR back up and running?
> > >>
> > >> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers.
> > >>
> > >> -ip-
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to