Hi,

I test HA using HA enable template. After issue command echo 0 > 
/proc/sysrq-trigger, instance still running on host A.

Id    Name                           State
----------------------------------------------------
 2     s-310-VM                       running
 3     r-266-VM                       running
 6     i-2-309-VM                     running

Is it correct step?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 2:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: HA Enabled ACS

Is this command to kill a process or what? Is it normal what a cloudstack 
management page show some delay after vm start/stop?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nux! [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 12:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: HA Enabled ACS

+1 what Simon said.
To "kill" host A do a simple:
echo o > /proc/sysrq-trigger

This will properly simulate a "crash".

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Weller" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 June, 2016 13:02:29
> Subject: RE: HA Enabled ACS

> If the host agent shuts down gracefully, I don't believe HA will kick 
> in. In the management console, you'll see the host in state 
> disconnected. If you pull the power on your host, or cause it to 
> kernel panic, the state should be listed as down in the console. The state 
> down should trigger HA.
> 
> Simon Weller/ENA
> (615) 312-6068
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mohd Zainal Abidin Rabani [[email protected]]
> Received: Wednesday, 29 Jun 2016, 3:50AM
> To: [email protected] [[email protected]]
> Subject: HA Enabled ACS
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> I have create HA enables from service offering > Compute offering. I 
> install vm using iso. I have 2 host that running kvm and connect to 
> ACS. After install I check vm running on host A. So I shutdown host A.
> I wait about 1o minute and vm still not up on host B. Storage using 
> ceph. Is it because of ceph or what? From the doc it said support 
> shared (NFS or iSCSI). I'm not sure it support ceph or not. Suppose to be 
> support. Advice needed.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks.

Reply via email to