Hi, after digging into the source code I wonder if
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/server/src/com/cloud/network/router/NetworkHelperImpl.java line 453 final List<HypervisorType> hypervisors = getHypervisors(routerDeploymentDefinition); line 458 for (final Iterator<HypervisorType> iter = hypervisors.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { ever gets more than one item in the list? In our case it looks like there is only one item in this list (KVM) even if we got three clusters - one with KVM and two with Xenserver and the VM gets deployed on Xenserver. Are you able to explain the following function to me? protected List<HypervisorType> getHypervisors(final RouterDeploymentDefinition routerDeploymentDefinition) throws InsufficientServerCapacityException { final DeployDestination dest = routerDeploymentDefinition.getDest(); List<HypervisorType> hypervisors = new ArrayList<HypervisorType>(); if (dest.getCluster() != null) { if (dest.getCluster().getHypervisorType() == HypervisorType.Ovm) { hypervisors.add(getClusterToStartDomainRouterForOvm(dest.getCluster().getPodId())); } else { hypervisors.add(dest.getCluster().getHypervisorType()); } } else { final HypervisorType defaults = _resourceMgr.getDefaultHypervisor(dest.getDataCenter().getId()); if (defaults != HypervisorType.None) { hypervisors.add(defaults); } else { // if there is no default hypervisor, get it from the cluster hypervisors = _resourceMgr.getSupportedHypervisorTypes(dest.getDataCenter().getId(), true, routerDeploymentDefinition.getPlan().getPodId()); } } How will that function return a list? All the best, Florian ________________________________________ From: Engelmann Florian <florian.engelm...@everyware.ch> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 12:24 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Ubuntu 16.04, Openvswitch networking issue Hi, this behavior was caused by the following setting: system.vm.default.hypervisor = Xenserver After setting this global parameter to NULL we are able to deploy SystemVMs (virtual router) on KVM. Sad to say, we are no more able to deploy SystemVMs on Xenserver since we changed the parameter?!?! Allocating the VR with id=4213 in datacenter com.cloud.dc.DataCenterVO$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$6fda4e4f@2 with the hypervisor type KVM [...] VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null host id before state transition: null Is anybody able to point me in the direction where to find the logic (on Github) behind how ACS decides which Hypervisor should be used to deploy a VirtualRouter SystemVM? Why is KVM chosen? All the best, Florian ________________________________________ From: Engelmann Florian Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 5:25 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Ubuntu 16.04, Openvswitch networking issue Hi Rafael, We do use the following setup (Test environment currently): ACS 4.9.2 1x Xenserver 6.5 Cluster (3 nodes) 1x Xenserver 7.0 Cluster (1 node) 1x Ubuntu 16.04 KVM Cluster (3 nodes) Networking = Advanced Zone VPC and Virtual Router I noticed the error Message was just informational an not the real problem. The problem we got is: [...] Allocating the VR with id=4185 in datacenter com.cloud.dc.DataCenterVO$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$caa6c375@2 with the hypervisor type XenServer [...] Cluster: 6 has HyperVisorType that does not match the VM, skipping this cluster [...] We tried to force ACS to use the KVM systemVM template but for some reason ACS refuses to use that System offering. Hosts: Name ewcstack-vh023-test Host Tags="kvm" Primary storage: Name: ewcstack-vh023-test,Local Storage: Storage Tags="vol-local-kvm" System offering: Name custom-local-sm-kvm Storage Tags="vol-local-kvm" Host Tags="kvm" Network offering: Name custom local kvm System offering="custom-local-sm-kvm" Disk offering: Name custom local kvm Storage Tags="vol-local-kvm" Creating a Instance with a network offering "custom-local-sm-kvm" doesn't stop ACS from using a XenServer systemVM template. Why? All the best, Florian ________________________________________ From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 4:08 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Ubuntu 16.04, Openvswitch networking issue I think we may need more information. ACS version, network deployment type, and hypervisors? On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Engelmann Florian < florian.engelm...@everyware.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > sorry I ment "I am NOT able to solve".... > > ________________________________________ > From: Engelmann Florian <florian.engelm...@everyware.ch> > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 3:36 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Ubuntu 16.04, Openvswitch networking issue > > Hi, > > another error I am able to solve: > > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,097 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-26:ctx- > 30020483) (logid:d303f8ef) ===START=== 192.168.252.76 -- GET > command=createNetwork&response=json&zoneId=e683eeaa- > 92c9-4651-91b9-165939f9000c&name=net-kvm008&displayText= > net-kvm008&networkOf > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,135 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.BigSwitchBcfGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Refusing to > design this network, the physical isolation type is not BCF_SEGMENT > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,136 DEBUG [o.a.c.n.c.m.ContrailGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Refusing to > design this network > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,137 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] > (DirectAgent-144:ctx-b2cdad73) (logid:eb129204) Seq > 179-6955246674520311671: Response Received: > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,137 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] > (StatsCollector-5:ctx-4298a591) > (logid:eb129204) Seq 179-6955246674520311671: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: > 345049101620, via: 179(ewcstack-vh003-test), Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { > GetStorageStatsAnswer } } > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,137 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.MidoNetGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) design called > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,138 DEBUG [c.c.h.o.r.Ovm3HypervisorGuru] > (StatsCollector-5:ctx-4298a591) (logid:eb129204) > getCommandHostDelegation: class com.cloud.agent.api.GetStorageStatsCommand > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,138 DEBUG [c.c.h.XenServerGuru] > (StatsCollector-5:ctx-4298a591) > (logid:eb129204) getCommandHostDelegation: class com.cloud.agent.api. > GetStorageStatsCommand > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,139 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.MidoNetGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Refusing to > design this network, the physical isolation type is not MIDO > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,139 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] > (DirectAgent-72:ctx-656a03ae) (logid:dd7ada9e) Seq 217-8596245788743434945: > Executing request > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,141 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.NiciraNvpGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Refusing to > design this network > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,142 DEBUG [o.a.c.n.o.OpendaylightGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Refusing to > design this network > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,144 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.OvsGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Refusing to > design this network > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,163 DEBUG [o.a.c.n.g.SspGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) SSP not > configured to be active > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,164 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.BrocadeVcsGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Refusing to > design this network > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,165 DEBUG [c.c.n.g.NuageVspGuestNetworkGuru] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Refusing to > design network using network offering 54 on physical network 200 > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,166 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) Releasing > lock for Acct[3426fb73-70ad-47d9-9c5d-355f34891438-fen] > 2017-02-17 15:24:36,188 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] > (catalina-exec-26:ctx-30020483 ctx-430b6ae1) (logid:d303f8ef) ===END=== > 192.168.252.76 -- GET command=createNetwork& > response=json&zoneId=e683eeaa-92c9-4651-91b9-165939f9000c& > name=net-kvm008&displayText=net-kvm00 > > > We do not use BigSwitch or anything like this, just plain Openvswitch with > Ubuntu 16.04. Any idea whats going on? > > All the best, > Florian > > EveryWare AG > Florian Engelmann > Systems Engineer > Zurlindenstrasse 52a > CH-8003 Zürich > > T +41 44 466 60 00 > F +41 44 466 60 10 > > florian.engelm...@everyware.ch > www.everyware.ch > -- Rafael Weingärtner
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
