+1 for Nux’ comment. CLVM is a challenge, and stability is an issue IMO.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 24/02/2017, 12:05, "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
Hello,
LVM is not a supported primary storage for Cloudstack. CLVM is, however
that's not the same thing - and it's not really "local".
I'd advise against using it, CLVM is not really a first class citizen in
Cloudstack.
If you can use local storage with qcow2, that'd be ideal. Easy to deploy,
template, snapshot etc etc.
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vladimir Melnik" <v.mel...@uplink.ua>
> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 16 February, 2017 15:59:27
> Subject: Re: Local LVM on KVM hosts
> Hello,
>
> Thanks! I'm sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough, but the thing I meant is
using
> separate LVM volumes without QEMU-images. :)
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:54:54PM +0000, Dag Sonstebo wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> Yes you can use local storage on KVM – you need to:
>>
>> 1) Enable it when you create the zone.
>> 2) Create service offerings with local storage.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dag Sonstebo
>> Cloud Architect
>> ShapeBlue
>>
>> On 16/02/2017, 13:36, "Vladimir Melnik" <v.mel...@uplink.ua> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to use the local LVMs as a primary storage on the KVM
hosts?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> V.Melnik
>>
>>
>>
>> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> V.Melnik
