Your problem might be like what Swen says, Jeremy but also a wrong systemvm
offering or a fault in your management network definition.
I am going to sum up some trivialities so bear with me;
What type of networking are you using on the XenServers?
What version of os does the ms run on?
What are the systemvm templates defined in your env?
What is the version of the systemvm.iso?
What is the capacity you have in your (test) environment?
What is the host os version for the hypervisors?
What is the management network range?
What are the other physical networks?
What storage do you use?
Is it reachable from the systemvm?
Is the big bad internet reachable for your SSVM’s public interface?
And of course,
How is the weather, where you are at?
I am not sure any of these question is going to lead you in the right direction
but one of them should.
On 15/06/17 13:56, "S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH" <s.brues...@proio.com> wrote:
I once did have some similar problem with my systemvms and my root cause
was that in the global settings it referred to the wrong systemvm template. I
am not sure if this helps you, but wanted to tell you.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
Swen
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017 01:55
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
Hahaha. The best response ever.
I dug through these emails and someone had soft of the same log messages
cannot attach network and blamed xenserver. Ok I'm cool with that but why oh
why is it only system vms?
Jeremy
________________________________________
From: Imran Ahmed [im...@eaxiom.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 6:22 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
Yes,
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:59 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
Is there anyone out there reading these messages?
Am I just not seeing responses?
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 8:12 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
I opened an issue since this is still an issue. CLOUDSTACK-9960
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 9:10 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
Any other suggestions?
I am going to be scheduling to run XenServer updates. But this all points
back to CANNOT_ATTACH_NETWORk.
I've verified nothing is active on the Public IP space that those two VM's
were living on.
Jeremy
________________________________________
From: Jeremy Peterson <jpeter...@acentek.net>
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:58 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
I see the vm's try to create on a host that I just removed from maintenance
mode to install updates and here are the logs
I don't see anything that sticks out to me as a failure message.
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] ['ip', 'route', 'del', '169.254.0.0/16']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] ['ifconfig', 'xapi12', '169.254.0.1',
'netmask', '255.255.0.0']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] ['ip', 'route', 'add', '169.254.0.0/16',
'dev', 'xapi12', 'src', '169.254.0.1']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13068] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] ['ip', 'route', 'del', '169.254.0.0/16']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] ['ifconfig', 'xapi12', '169.254.0.1',
'netmask', '255.255.0.0']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] ['ip', 'route', 'add', '169.254.0.0/16',
'dev', 'xapi12', 'src', '169.254.0.1']
Jun 9 09:53:54 Xen3 SM: [13071] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] on-slave.multi: {'vgName':
'VG_XenStorage-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2', 'lvName1':
'VHD-633338a7-6c40-4aa6-b88e-c798b6fdc04d', 'action1':
'deactivateNoRefcount', 'action2': 'cleanupLock', 'uuid2':
'633338a7-6c40-4aa6-b88e-c798b6fdc04d', 'ns2':
'lvm-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2'}
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] LVMCache created for
VG_XenStorage-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] on-slave.action 1: deactivateNoRefcount Jun
9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] LVMCache: will initialize now Jun 9 09:54:00
Xen3 SM: [13115] LVMCache: refreshing Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115]
['/usr/sbin/lvs', '--noheadings', '--units', 'b', '-o', '+lv_tags',
'/dev/VG_XenStorage-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2']
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] ['/usr/sbin/lvchange', '-an',
'/dev/VG_XenStorage-469b6dcd-8466-3d03-de0e-cc3983e1b6e2/VHD-633338a7-6c40-4
aa6-b88e-c798b6fdc04d']
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] ['/sbin/dmsetup', 'status',
'VG_XenStorage--469b6dcd--8466--3d03--de0e--cc3983e1b6e2-VHD--633338a7--6c40
--4aa6--b88e--c798b6fdc04d']
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:00 Xen3 SM: [13115] on-slave.action 2: cleanupLock
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] ['ip', 'route', 'del', '169.254.0.0/16']
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] ['ifconfig', 'xapi12', '169.254.0.1',
'netmask', '255.255.0.0']
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] ['ip', 'route', 'add', '169.254.0.0/16',
'dev', 'xapi12', 'src', '169.254.0.1']
Jun 9 09:54:16 Xen3 SM: [13230] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:19 Xen3 updatempppathd: [15446] The garbage collection routine
returned: 0 Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] ['ip', 'route', 'del',
'169.254.0.0/16']
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] ['ifconfig', 'xapi12', '169.254.0.1',
'netmask', '255.255.0.0']
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] pread SUCCESS
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] ['ip', 'route', 'add', '169.254.0.0/16',
'dev', 'xapi12', 'src', '169.254.0.1']
Jun 9 09:54:23 Xen3 SM: [13277] pread SUCCESS
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:53 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
I am checking SMlog now on all hosts.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 9:00 AM
To: Users <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
on xenserver log, did you check what is causing "
HOST_CANNOT_ATTACH_NETWORK"?
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Jeremy Peterson <jpeter...@acentek.net>
wrote:
> 08:28:43 select * from vm_instance where name like 's-%' limit
> 10000 7481 row(s) returned 0.000 sec / 0.032 sec
>
> All vm's 'state' returned Destoryed outside of the current vm 7873
> which is in a Stopped state but that goes Destroyed and a new get created.
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 12:47 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
>
> I'll make that change in the am.
>
> Today I put a host in maintence and rebooted because proxy and
> secstore vm were constantly being created on that host and still no
change.
>
> Let you know tomorrow.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
> Date: 6/8/17 12:07 AM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Users <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
>
> Did you check SMLog on xenserver?
> unable to destroy task(com.xensource.xenapi.Task@256829a8) on
> host(b34f086e-fabf-471e-9feb-8f54362d7d0f) due to You gave an invalid
> object reference. The object may have recently been deleted. The
> class parameter gives the type of reference given, and the handle
> parameter echoes the bad value given.
>
> Looks like Destroy of SSVM failed. What state is SSVM in? mark it as
> Destroyed in cloud DB and wait for cloudstack to create a new SSVM.
>
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Jeremy Peterson
> <jpeter...@acentek.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Probably agreed.
> >
> > But I ran toolstack restart on all hypervisors and v-3193 just tried
> > to create and fail along with s-5398.
> >
> > The PIF error went away. But VM's are still recreating
> >
> > https://pastebin.com/4n4xBgMT
> >
> > New log from this afternoon.
> >
> > My catalina.out is over 4GB
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Makrand [mailto:makrandsa...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 12:52 AM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Looks more like hypervisor issue.
> >
> > Just run *xe-toolstack-restart* on hosts where these VMs are trying
> > to start or if you don't have too many hosts, better run on all
> > members including master. most of i/o related issues squared off by
> > toolstack bounce.
> >
> > --
> > Makrand
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Jeremy Peterson
> > <jpeter...@acentek.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok so I pulled this from Sunday morning.
> > >
> > > https://pastebin.com/nCETw1sC
> > >
> > >
> > > errorInfo: [HOST_CANNOT_ATTACH_NETWORK,
> > > OpaqueRef:65d0c844-bd70-81e9-4518-8809e1dc0ee7,
> > > OpaqueRef:0093ac3f-9f3a-37e1-9cdb-581398d27ba2]
> > >
> > > XenServer error.
> > >
> > > Now this still gets me because all of the other VM's launched just
> fine.
> > >
> > > Going into XenCenter I see an error at the bottom This PIF is a
> > > bond slave and cannot be plugged.
> > >
> > > ???
> > >
> > > If I go to networking on the hosts I see the storage vlans and
> > > bonds are all there.
> > >
> > > I see my GUEST-PUB bond is there and LACP is setup correct.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jeremy Peterson [mailto:jpeter...@acentek.net]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:23 AM
> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Recreating SystemVM's
> > >
> > > Thank you all for those responses.
> > >
> > > I'll comb through my management-server.log and post a pastebin if
> > > I'm scratching my head.
> > >
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 6:53 AM
> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Recreating SystemVM's
> > >
> > > If the zone is enabled, cloudstack should recreate them automatically.
> > >
> > > ~ Rajani
> > >
> > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> > >
> > > On June 6, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Erik Weber (terbol...@gmail.com)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > CloudStack should recreate automatically, check the mgmt server
> > > logs for hints of why it doesn't happen.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Erik
> > >
> > > tir. 6. jun. 2017 kl. 04.29 skrev Jeremy Peterson
> > > <jpeter...@acentek.net>:
> > >
> > > I had an issue Sunday morning with cloudstack 4.9.0 and xenserver
> 6.5.0.
> > > My hosts stop sending LACP PDU's and caused a network drop to
> > > iSCSI primary storage.
> > >
> > > So all my instances recovered via HA enabled.
> > >
> > > But my console proxy and secondary storage system VM's got stuck
> > > in a boot state that would not power on.
> > >
> > > At this time they are expunged and gone.
> > >
> > > How do I tell cloudstack-management to recreate system VM's?
> > >
> > > I'm drawing a blank since deploying CS two years ago and just
> > > keeping things running and adding hosts and more storage
> > > everything has been so stable.
> > >
> > > Jeremy
> > >
> >
>
- proIO GmbH -
Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main
USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen.
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich
erhalten haben,
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail.
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind
nicht gestattet.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
error) please notify
the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
