Thank you for the explanation. Is good to know that there really were an incompatibility problem, and not a mistake during config.
Thank you again for your work and time. Regards. El 28/12/2017 9:55, "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> escribió: > Sebastian, > > XenServer 7.1 and 7.2 aren't supported in 4.9.x - the main fix is to add > the guest OS mappings to the database. These have been added for 4.11, but > there seems to be a slight change in behaviour in XS7.1 when adding a host > to a cluster which is confusing CloudStack. > > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastian Gomez [mailto:tioc...@gmail.com] > Sent: 28 December 2017 08:08 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Upgrading to XenServer 7.x > > Hi all. > > I had a similar problem, but usign XenServer 7.2. It was a fresh > installation from scratch. The system vms where created, but them *could'nt > get the local link IP*, so the cloudstack agent never went up. > > After that, I found the compatibility matrix, where its specified that the > compatible versions of XenServer are up to 7.0... > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack- > release-notes/en/4.9.2.0/compat.html#supported-hypervisor-versions > > That's the point where I'm, trying to configure them with XS 7.0, but > unfortunately XS 7.0 does not provide drivers for our Broadcom > BCM57412 10Gb network eth adapters. > Here we are, working on how to add the drivers... > > > Good luck! > > > > > Atentamente, > Sebastián Gómez > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Just as FYI, we recently upgrade from 6.5 to xs 7.1, so far everthing > > is good. Then we add some hosts to Pool or reinstall some XenServer to > > have proper new filesystem on dom0 which have more disk space for > /var/log! > > then we ran into the situation where CloudStack fail to create > > Virtual Router in a XenServer cluster. Turns out that for some unknown > > reason, adding a fresh installed xenserver to a cluster can create new > > SR and VDI for xs-tools iso, this break cloudstack VR creation for > > some reason. So the easy fix is to forget non-shared SR containing > xs-tools VDI. > > > > Basically, if "xe vdi-list is-tools-iso=true" return more than one > > iso, CloudStack should fail to create Virtual-Router. > > >