No problem.
I am leaving work now but will test first thing tomorrow and get back to you. I definitely have NFS storage as far as I can tell ! ________________________________ From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> Sent: 05 June 2018 16:13 To: users Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs That is interesting. Let's see the source of all truth... This is the code that is generating that odd message. > List<StoragePoolVO> clusterPools = > _storagePoolDao.listPoolsByCluster(agent.getClusterId()); > boolean hasNfs = false; > for (StoragePoolVO pool : clusterPools) { > if (pool.getPoolType() == StoragePoolType.NetworkFilesystem) { > hasNfs = true; > break; > } > } > if (!hasNfs) { > s_logger.warn( > "Agent investigation was requested on host " + agent + > ", but host does not support investigation because it has no NFS storage. > Skipping investigation."); > return Status.Disconnected; > } > There are two possibilities here. You do not have any NFS storage? Is that the case? Or maybe, for some reason, the call "_storagePoolDao.listPoolsByCluster(agent.getClusterId())" is not returning any NFS storage pools. Looking at the "listPoolsByCluster " we will see that the following SQL is used: Select * from storage_pool where cluster_id = <host'sClusterId> and removed > is not null > Can you run that SQL to see the its return when your hosts are marked as disconnected? On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Jon Marshall <jms....@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > I reran the tests with the 3 NIC setup. When I configured the zone through > the UI I used the labels cloudbr0 for management, cloudbr1 for guest > traffic and cloudbr2 for NFS as per my original response to you. > > > When I pull the power to the node (dcp-cscn2.local) after about 5 mins > the host status goes to "Alert" but never to "Down" > > > I get this in the logs - > > > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 WARN [c.c.h.KVMInvestigator] > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) Agent investigation was > requested on host Host[-4-Routing], but host does not support investigation > because it has no NFS storage. Skipping investigation. > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 DEBUG [c.c.h.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl] > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) KVMInvestigator was able to > determine host 4 is in Disconnected > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 INFO [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) The agent from host 4 state > determined is Disconnected > 2018-06-05 15:17:14,382 WARN [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] > (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-f4da4dc9) (logid:138e9a93) Agent is disconnected but > the host is still up: 4-dcp-cscn2.local > > I don't understand why it thinks there is no NFS storage as each compute > node has a dedicated storage NIC. > > > I also don't understand why it thinks the host is still up ie. what test > is it doing to determine that ? > > > Am I just trying to get something working that is not supported ? > > > ________________________________ > From: Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > Sent: 04 June 2018 15:31 > To: users > Subject: Re: advanced networking with public IPs direct to VMs > > What type of failover are you talking about? > What ACS version are you using? > What hypervisor are you using? > How are you configuring your NICs in the hypervisor? > How are you configuring the traffic labels in ACS? > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Jon Marshall <jms....@hotmail.co.uk> > wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > I am close to giving up on basic networking as I just cannot get failover > > working with multiple NICs (I am not even sure it is supported). > > > > > > What I would like is to use 3 NICs for management, storage and guest > > traffic. I would like to assign public IPs direct to the VMs which is > why I > > originally chose basic. > > > > > > If I switch to advanced networking do I just configure a guest VM with > > public IPs on one NIC and not both with the public traffic - > > > > > > would this work ? > > > > > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner > -- Rafael Weingärtner