Hi,

I suspect this may be your issue in the logs:

2018-08-12 21:58:59,221 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper] 
(AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-9d6d3af1) (logid:0e6b44f3) SSH execution of command xe 
sm-list | grep "resigning of duplicates" has an error status code in return. 
Result output: 
2018-08-12 21:58:59,236 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.XenServer620Resource] 
(AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-9d6d3af1) (logid:0e6b44f3) can't get patches information 
for hotFix: 996dd2e7-ad95-49cc-a0be-2c9adc4dfb0b
2018-08-12 21:58:59,248 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.XenServer620Resource] 
(AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-9d6d3af1) (logid:0e6b44f3) can't get patches information 
for hotFix: 0850b186-4d47-11e3-a720-001b2151a503
2018-08-12 21:58:59,538 WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] 
(AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-9d6d3af1) (logid:0e6b44f3) Unable to get local EXTSR in 
host:f9decbcc-562d-4db5-a50c-67f06dc34f56SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_47The SR is not 
available [opterr=no such directory 
/var/run/sr-mount/721a277c-fe33-472f-b186-c785042d4d46]

Is /var/run/sr-mount/721a277c-fe33-472f-b186-c785042d4d46 the mount for the 
systemvm iso?


Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Netlynker <netlyn...@gmail.com> 
Sent: 13 August 2018 06:47
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: systemvm settings not deployd

Hi,

Log in to system VM as root/password. Run "virt-who" and note the last line of 
the output.

Then check this script /opt/cloud/bin/setup/cloud-early-config which  is 
responsible for configuring systemvm to correct role (router or consoleproxy or 
so on).

Might not give you solution. but I hope it give you some clue where to start.

Regards,

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:49 AM Kristian Liivak <k...@wavecom.ee> wrote:

> Hi All
>
> Just upgraded ACS 4.11 to 4.11.1
> No errors during pocess.
> After that upgraded successfully VR
>
> After deleting SSVM and Console proxy new systems vm´s were created.
> However new systemvm´s agents never started because there was no 
> network present. only loopack interface..
> I guess nessesary configuration was not deployd as needed.
>
> Does anyone run something similar and have fix ?
>
> Logs for my try [ https://pastebin.com/raw/iPqt9uLA | 
> https://pastebin.com/raw/iPqt9uLA ] Didnt saw any signifficant errors 
> ..
>
> Regards
>
> Kristian Liivak
>
>

Reply via email to