Wot he said ^^^ There as a Swiss based provider named CloudSigma (where I was one of their customers loooooong time ago) - they were using Gluster (loooooong time ago) and they had tremendous issues, reverting whole storage snapshots like a week in the past - all of the sudden you/me see crazy log lines where you actually understand that they reverted the storage back to past... Ceph does require quite a bit of knowledge on managing but is widely used (in general) and also with CloudStack.
For searching - check this one https://lists.apache.org/list.html?users@cloudstack.apache.org (you can choose dev@ and other mailing lists) (Once you are subscribed for 4-5-6 years, it will be also searchable via your inbox :) ) Cheers On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 13:07, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > CEPH is much, much more used with Cloudstack than Glusterfs (from what I > see in the community). > As a product in itself it is arguably much, much more deployed than > Glusterfs. > I like Glusterfs, it's so simple to deploy and manage, but I'm afraid > it's the loser in this race. > > hth > > --- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > On 2019-07-30 11:46, Michael Kesper wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In many documentation materials, I see CEPH mentioned but not Gluster. > > Is CEPH support superior in cloudstack to gluster support? > > Or is the performance of CEPH so much better than Gluster? > > > > Thanks for your answers > > Michael > > > > P.S.: These mailing lists are not very searchable :( > -- Andrija Panić
