Hi

Are you running on CentOS7 ?

I am running on CentOS7 ,  ACS 4.14 ,  and  seem there is no log at of
security_group.log

# ls /var/log/cloudstack/agent/

agent.log  resizevolume.log  setup.log


I recheck back the Intall guide, seems no missing anything.


Older intallation guide, 4.11 mentioned need , allow
/usr/lib/sysctl.d/00-system.conf

# Enable netfilter on bridges. net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 1
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables
= 1

And it has been done too.



On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 4:05 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev <i...@bw-sw.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> No, this is not the issue.
> It's a normal state of the system, as KVM hooks are a new and optional
> feature of 4.14.
>
> You should find some sort of messages regarding security_groups at
> /var/log/cloudstack/agent/security_group.log
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 2:10 PM Hean Seng <heans...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I not sure where goes wrong,  are you running on CentOS 7 ? I have this
> > error too, do you think is this contribute to the error as well:
> >
> > 2020-09-28 03:04:52,762 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtKvmAgentHook]
> > (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:4f23845b) Groovy script
> > '/etc/cloudstack/agent/hooks/libvirt-vm-xml-transformer.groovy' is not
> > available. Transformations will not be applied.
> >
> > 2020-09-28 03:04:52,762 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtKvmAgentHook]
> > (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:4f23845b) Groovy scripting engine is
> > not initialized. Data transformation skipped.
> >
> > 2020-09-28 03:04:53,083 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtKvmAgentHook]
> > (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:4f23845b) Groovy script
> > '/etc/cloudstack/agent/hooks/libvirt-vm-state-change.groovy' is not
> > available. Transformations will not be applied.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 2:27 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev <i...@bw-sw.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This just means you installed it in the wrong way. Ebtables and
> Iptables
> > > must be filled with rules like
> > >
> > > -A i-6242-10304-def -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
> > > -A i-6242-10304-def -p udp -m physdev --physdev-in vnet18
> > > --physdev-is-bridged -m udp --sport 68 --dport 67 -j ACCEPT
> > > -A i-6242-10304-def -p udp -m physdev --physdev-out vnet18
> > > --physdev-is-bridged -m udp --sport 67 --dport 68 -j ACCEPT
> > > -A i-6242-10304-def -m physdev --physdev-in vnet18 --physdev-is-bridged
> > -m
> > > set ! --match-set i-6242-10304-vm src -j DROP
> > > -A i-6242-10304-def -p udp -m physdev --physdev-in vnet18
> > > --physdev-is-bridged -m set --match-set i-6242-10304-vm src -m udp
> > --dport
> > > 53 -j RETURN
> > > -A i-6242-10304-def -p tcp -m physdev --physdev-in vnet18
> > > --physdev-is-bridged -m set --match-set i-6242-10304-vm src -m tcp
> > --dport
> > > 53 -j RETURN
> > > -A i-6242-10304-def -m physdev --physdev-in vnet18 --physdev-is-bridged
> > -m
> > > set --match-set i-6242-10304-vm src -j i-6242-10304-vm-eg
> > > -A i-6242-10304-def -m physdev --physdev-out vnet18
> --physdev-is-bridged
> > -j
> > > i-6242-10304-vm
> > > -A i-6242-10304-vm -p udp -m udp --dport 1:65535 -m state --state NEW
> -j
> > > ACCEPT
> > > -A i-6242-10304-vm -p tcp -m tcp --dport 1:65535 -m state --state NEW
> -j
> > > ACCEPT
> > > -A i-6242-10304-vm -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT
> > > -A i-6242-10304-vm -j DROP
> > >
> > >
> > > Bridge chain: i-4435-8929-vm-in, entries: 7, policy: ACCEPT
> > > -s ! 1e:0:32:0:2:2 -j DROP
> > > -p ARP -s ! 1e:0:32:0:2:2 -j DROP
> > > -p ARP --arp-mac-src ! 1e:0:32:0:2:2 -j DROP
> > > -p ARP -j i-4435-8929-vm-in-ips
> > > -p ARP --arp-op Request -j ACCEPT
> > > -p ARP --arp-op Reply -j ACCEPT
> > > -p ARP -j DROP
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:10 PM Hean Seng <heans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I checked the hypervisor , it seems iptables is nothing inside ,
> this
> > is
> > > > centos7 ,  initially i turnoff firewalld ,  but even i turn on it now
> > and
> > > > try to update the security group rules, it seems empty iptable rules
> :
> > > >
> > > > [root@kvm03 ~]# iptables -L -v -n
> > > >
> > > > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 82903 packets, 1170M bytes)
> > > >
> > > >  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> > > > destination
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> > > >
> > > >  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> > > > destination
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 80505 packets, 25M bytes)
> > > >
> > > >  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
> > > > destination
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:05 PM Pearl d'Silva <
> > > pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hean,
> > > > >
> > > > > In an Advanced Zone with Security Groups enabled, by default,
> egress
> > > > > traffic from the VM is allowed, while Ingress traffic is denied.
> > Hence,
> > > > as
> > > > > you rightly mentioned, security group rules are added accordingly.
> > > These
> > > > > rules get added on the hypervisor host, and you can verify them, by
> > > going
> > > > > into the host and searching for iptables rules corresponding to the
> > VM
> > > > > (internal name - i-x-y-VM).
> > > > > This blog maybe helpful in providing further details:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://shankerbalan.net/blog/cloudstack-advanced-zone-with-security-groups/
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Pearl
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Hean Seng <heans...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2020 2:48 PM
> > > > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: Cloudstack Advance with Security Group
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > I created advance zone with security group, all working fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > But VMcreated , seems the default security group that assigned to
> the
> > > VM.
> > > > > all accept policy , i understand  is Default Deny, and once add in
> > the
> > > > port
> > > > > in Security Group Ingress and Egress, only is allowed
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, is this rules created at VirtualRouter of the SharedNetwork,
> or
> > > at
> > > > > the Hypervisor?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Hean Seng
> > > > >
> > > > > pearl.dsi...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > > > 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1
> 9SGUK
> > > > > @shapeblue
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Hean Seng
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hean Seng
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Hean Seng

Reply via email to