Hi Darin,

well from a "technical" point of view, i currently have problems
getting the ssvm running. I have to admit that i need to take a closer
look into the logs myself to see what is happening. First messages i
read stated some problems with primary / secondary storage and the
given uuids. Might be a problem as i joyned the compute host in an
unusal(?) or not described way...
Which leads to my next problem:
Understanding the process of joining hosts.
Described in the documentation are more or less always the same way.
Log in to the management server gui - add host - give the requiered
data - and then the host will join (given the agent on the host is
installed properly). However, in non of my installation-trials this
worked out of the box (even if ubuntu 20.04 is expicit named in the
compability matrix).
Problems have been (using ubuntu server 20.04):
- ssh keys not working because of mangement server settings
- usage of older SSH algorithms...
- connections couldn't be established as the agent.conf had no
IP-addresses for the management-server (which is from my understanding
"normal" - the host can't know anything about the management server
till the connection from the management server is initialized).
however the agent is all the time lookining for an management server.
- missing uuid entrys....
- missing rights for users (as root isn't allowed connect via ssh out
of the box)
Nothing of this is part of the latest integration guide / mentioned in
the docs - beside the SSH algorithms in the release notes for 4.15
(shame on me for reading them to late).

Don't get me wrong i am not blameing it on cloudstack at all- but
without all the background information it is hard to solve occuring
problems.

I really like many of the appoaches CloudStack is useing and
following. But from an "installation" point of view the installation
of OpenStack was more successfull and more "straight-forward" then the
installation of CloudStack.

with regards
Chris

Am Fr., 9. Apr. 2021 um 08:35 Uhr schrieb Darrin Hüsselmann
<[email protected]>:
>
> Great,
>
> What other issues are you facing?
>
> Regards
> Darrin
>
> [email protected]
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 9:08 PM
> To: Darrin Hüsselmann <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Services of management server listening on IPv6 Ports
>
> Hi Darrin,
>
> thanks for the information provided! Was interesting to read this.
>
> even if i am still faceing some other issues at the moment.
>
> Am Do., 8. Apr. 2021 um 09:24 Uhr schrieb Darrin Hüsselmann
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > I think this link might shed some light on your findings.
> >
> > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/573456/why-does-lsof-indicate-my-ipv4-socket-is-ipv6
> >
> > Cheers
> > Darrin
> >
> > [email protected]
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 12:26 PM
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Services of management server listening on IPv6 Ports
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I was setting up an test-environment with an IPv4 network beneath.
> > OS of the server is Ubuntu 20.04.02-live-server.
> >
> > After performing the installation like descriped in the installation
> > guide, the server seems fine.
> > One thing i noticed is, that the sockets for the services of
> > cloudstack / listening ports are all IPv6 based:
> >
> > root@management:~# lsof -i -P -n | grep cloud | grep LISTEN
> > java      1184           cloud   12u  IPv6  48210      0t0  TCP *:35947 
> > (LISTEN)
> > java      1184           cloud   21u  IPv6  50162      0t0  TCP *:9090 
> > (LISTEN)
> > java      1184           cloud   22u  IPv6  48825      0t0  TCP *:35627 
> > (LISTEN)
> > java      1184           cloud   26u  IPv6  51204      0t0  TCP *:8250 
> > (LISTEN)
> > java      1184           cloud   30u  IPv6  52307      0t0  TCP *:8080 
> > (LISTEN)
> >
> > Shouldn't these services also listening on IPv4 addresses of the
> > management interface?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > Chris

Reply via email to