I did some tests, if i make a zone with 1 physical interface (on bond with
label bond02) and all networks are on it - management, public, guest - all
is working fine.
But when i have 2 physical interfaces (labels bond01 for guest and bond02
for mgmt and public) the the following error appears when VR is being
created:

2022-09-14 08:34:44,009 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-265:ctx-cc426eab) (logid:74d57e46) Failed to find SR by name
'XenServer Tools', will try to find 'XCP-ng Tools' SR
2022-09-14 08:34:44,508 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-265:ctx-cc426eab) (logid:74d57e46) VBD
d9d2a315-cb27-8f20-7c61-695f14d62259 created for
com.cloud.agent.api.to.DiskTO@27636827
2022-09-14 08:34:44,508 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-265:ctx-cc426eab) (logid:74d57e46) Creating VIF for r-186-VM
on nic [Nic:Guest-172.128.0.20-vlan://500]
2022-09-14 08:34:44,509 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-265:ctx-cc426eab) (logid:74d57e46) Looking for network named
bond01
2022-09-14 08:34:44,515 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.XsLocalNetwork]
(DirectAgent-265:ctx-cc426eab) (logid:74d57e46) Found a network called
bond01 on host=172.16.14.105;
 Network=c9fbc161-e7ee-72cf-295c-1653da3ba596;
pif=714fe823-dcd5-8115-305c-4a243ffcd396
2022-09-14 08:34:44,517 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-265:ctx-cc426eab) (logid:74d57e46) Creating VLAN 500 on host
172.16.14.105 on device bond0
2022-09-14 08:34:44,522 WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.w.x.CitrixStartCommandWrapper]
(DirectAgent-265:ctx-cc426eab) (logid:74d57e46) Catch Exception: class
com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifVlanExists due to You tried to create a PIF,
but it already exists.
You tried to create a PIF, but it already exists.


I don't understand why it says "Creating VLAN 500 on host 172.16.14.105 on
device bond0" where i dont have such a device or label?
Could it be a bug?  (v4.17.0.1 + xcp-ng 8.2.1 latest updates).

Regards,
Jordan

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:49 AM jordan j <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here you go!
> https://filebin.net/fw07uwmlmjd0f1yp/management-server.log
>
> Snippet is generated during the start of a new user vm which also try to
> start VR.
>
> Alright I see one more issue I did not catch before:
> - You tried to create a PIF, but it already exists. (for the NIC of the
> VR) regards,
> Jordan
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:10 AM Wei ZHOU <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jordan,
>>
>> Can you share a full log of the api call
>> in /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log ?
>>
>> -Wei
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Sept 2022 at 08:11, jordan j <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear community,
>> >
>> >  I have a fresh environment 4.17.0.1 with 1 XenServer.
>> > - 1 Zone - both System VMs and User VMs on Local storage options
>> selected.
>> > - server nics and network design - 2 bonds with VIrtual Router and VPC
>> > enabled.
>> >    -> Public (BOND01 label) - x.x.x.21-29
>> >    -> mgmt (BOND01 label)  - x.x.x.100-199
>> >    -> guest (BOND02 label)
>> >
>> > Network offerings and zone networks created from them:
>> > - SHARED_LOCAL - Shared network offering created (BOND02) with Virtual
>> > Router for Local storage. It will provide DHCP, DNS, USERDATA.
>> > - SHARED_NO_VR - shared network with no VR or services
>> >
>> > USER VM creation on different networks:
>> > (1) starting a VM on SHARED_LOCAL network - creation fails.
>> > (2) starting a VM on SHARED_NO_VR network - it works without a problem.
>> >
>> > However during (1) VR is created in infrastructure -> VR  tab but failed
>> > to start. An attempt to start it manually fails with error.
>> > Unable to create a deployment for VM instance {id: "175", name:
>> "r-175-VM",
>> > uuid: "47a5b579-8aab-4df0-b305-07de30ae7ab0",
>> > type="DomainRouter"}Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=47
>> >
>> > I see the problem is in interface creation (in GUI i see one halfway
>> > created interface of traffic Type: Control) but i am not really sure
>> how to
>> > take it from here.
>> >
>> > What else needs to be enabled for the VR to work? How to further
>> continue
>> > with troubleshooting from here?
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Jordan
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to