Hello,

I'm having a networking issue on SSVMs,  I have the following networks defined 
in “Zone 1”.  

Management: 10.101.0.0/22
Storage: 10.101.6.0/23

All worked well until we decided to configure new storage devices on 
10.101.7.x, the hosts and management server have no issue but the SSVM is not 
able to reach it.  Here are the defined interfaces of the SSVM and the routing 
table of the SSVM:

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP 
group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:72:ec brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp0s3
    altname ens3
    inet 169.254.114.236/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP 
group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp0s4
    altname ens4
    inet 10.101.3.205/22 brd 10.101.3.255 scope global eth1
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP 
group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 1e:00:6b:00:00:3d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp0s5
    altname ens5
    inet 148.59.36.61/28 brd 148.59.36.63 scope global eth2
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: eth3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP 
group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 1e:00:09:00:00:6b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp0s6
    altname ens6
    inet 10.101.7.226/23 brd 10.101.7.255 scope global eth3
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

default via 148.59.36.49 dev eth2 
10.0.0.0/8 via 10.101.0.1 dev eth1 
10.91.0.0/23 via 10.101.0.1 dev eth1 
10.91.6.0/24 via 10.101.0.1 dev eth1 
10.101.0.0/22 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.101.3.253 
10.101.6.0/23 via 10.101.0.1 dev eth1 
148.59.36.48/28 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 148.59.36.61 
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.232.208 
172.16.0.0/12 via 10.101.0.1 dev eth1 
192.168.0.0/16 via 10.101.0.1 dev eth1 

Why is the routing for 10.101.6.0/23 routing via eth1, shoudn’nt it be using 
eth3?  The router seems to be bypassing the routing rules for 10.101.6.x since 
I see no traffic going through the gateway but I see traffic going through the 
gateway when the destination is 10.101.7.x

If I modify the routing for 10.101.6.0/23 to eth3 all is well.

Is this by design?

Regards,
Antoine Boucher

Reply via email to