Following to my previous message I have decided to simplify my observations.

Looking at the SSVM network and routing.  My storage ip is defined on eth3 but 
the routing of the storage subnet is configured via eth1, the Management 
Network.

Is this an oversight or a desired behaviour?  The only way to solve the issue 
is for me to use the Management Network for SecStorage or change the routing 
through eth3. 

I’m assuming that this issue has been reported a number of times?

Regards,
Antoine

Reply via email to