Hi,

Can you check if port 8080 and 8250 of 10.0.33.1 is accessible from kvm
hosts and system vm ?


-Wei


On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 11:59, jaejong <cb...@naver.com> wrote:

> Hi wei
> Yes.
> KVM host reject port 8080,8250,9090.
> Server only open the ports. So Host can connect to server with the ports,
> But Server can not connect to Host.
>
> Host can ping to server.
> system vms can ping to server, also ssh connect to server.
>
> system vms public ip is allocated state.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Wei ZHOU"<ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org>;
> Cc:
> Sent: 2023-10-09 (월) 18:29:38 (GMT+09:00)
> Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 not ipv4
>
> Hi,
>
> The port 8250 should be open on the management server (10.0.33.1) , and
> accessible from mgmt server, kvm host and system vms.
> From what you said, the port 8250 is accessible from mgmt server and kvm
> host, but not from system vms.
> Can you confirm if ping and port 8080 (of 10.0.33.1) work or not?
>
> Kind regards,
> Wei
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 10:44, jaejong <cb...@naver.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Wei
> > thanks for your reply!
> >
> > From server  nc to
> > server itself:  connected
> > host: connection refused
> > sVm : No route to host or Connection timed out
> >
> > From host nc to
> > host itself: Connection refused
> > server : onnected
> > svm: No route to host
> >
> > port 9090 is same status with 8250
> >
> > host status
> > getenforce : Permissive
> > firewalld : disabled
> > /etc/sysconfig/iptables : created when added to cluster
> > there are no entry for 8250 and 9090
> >
> > thanks
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Wei ZHOU"<ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> > To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org>;
> > Cc:
> > Sent: 2023-10-09 (월) 16:14:57 (GMT+09:00)
> > Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 not ipv4
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you check if port 8250 is open for Ipv4 addresses (from the
> management
> > server itself, a kvm host and system vms) ? If not, can you restart
> > cloudstack-management service ?
> >
> > You can use netcat or telnet, see examples below
> >
> > [root@kvm1 ~]# nc -vz 10.0.32.105 8250
> > Connection to 10.0.32.105 8250 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
> > [root@kvm1 ~]# telnet 10.0.32.105 8250
> > Trying 10.0.32.105...
> > Connected to 10.0.32.105.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
> > ^]
> >
> > telnet>
> >
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 04:44, jaejong <cb...@naver.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Wei and Wido
> > >
> > > You are right about The netstat output looks ok.
> > >
> > > So I check more about this problem.
> > >
> > > Java uses IPv6 preferentially when both IPv4 and IPv6 are available in
> > the
> > > OS.
> > >
> > > So, when looking at network port information used with netstat or lsof,
> > > etc.
> > > the address is displayed as IPv6.
> > >
> > > However, if the server is IPv6-only and does not have an IPv4 address,
> > > then attempting to connect using an IPv4 address from client,
> > > will likely result in an error,
> > > as there will be no corresponding IPv4 endpoint to connect to.
> > >
> > > In such cases, you would need to ensure that the server can accept IPv4
> > > connections or
> > > adjust your code to handle IPv6.
> > >
> > > with only "tcp6 0 0 :::8080 :::* LISTEN 1454/java'
> > > I can connect to management server by "http://10.0.33.1:8080/client/";
> > >
> > > With both tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:*  and tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN
> > > Ican connect to server from SSVM and SPVM.
> > >
> > > So I think my server has no problem.
> > >
> > > If you're upgrading an older version,
> > > sometimes it may work because the upgrade doesn't change the
> > configuration
> > > file.
> > >
> > > I did a fresh install of OS and ACS.
> > >
> > > Would you check more please?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "jaejong"<cb...@naver.com>
> > > To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org>;
> > > Cc:
> > > Sent: 2023-10-04 (수) 18:36:38 (GMT+09:00)
> > > Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 not ipv4
> > >
> > > Hi Wei ZHOU
> > >
> > > There are no problem with ping.
> > >
> > > I connect to management server by ssh with no problems.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Wei ZHOU"<ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> > > To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org>;
> > > Cc:
> > > Sent: 2023-10-04 (수) 18:04:47 (GMT+09:00)
> > > Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 not ipv4
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The route should be good. But the TCP packets might be dropped
> somewhere
> > > (ping uses ICMP packets not TCP)
> > >
> > > -Wei
> > >
> > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 11:01, jaejong <cb...@naver.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes,  eth1 IPs of system vms are in the same subnet as 10.0.33.1
> > > > there is no dropped packets during ping.
> > > >
> > > > thanks a lot!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: "Wei ZHOU"<ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org>;
> > > > Cc:
> > > > Sent: 2023-10-04 (수) 17:35:56 (GMT+09:00)
> > > > Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 not ipv4
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > +1 with what Wido said.
> > > >
> > > > The packet is probably dropped/blocked at a point between SSVM and
> the
> > > > management server (if it is running fine).
> > > >
> > > > Are the eth1 IPs of system vms in the same subnet as 10.0.33.1 ?
> > > >
> > > > -Wei
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 09:25, jaejong <cb...@naver.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Wei ZHOU!
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, I can ping to  server ip(10.0.33.1) from SSVM and SPVM.
> > > > >
> > > > > netstat does not report about  0.0.0.0:8250.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, then what is the problems!!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: "Wei ZHOU"<ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: <users@cloudstack.apache.org>;
> > > > > Cc:
> > > > > Sent: 2023-10-04 (수) 15:31:50 (GMT+09:00)
> > > > > Subject: Re: server listen ipv6 not ipv4
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > The netstat output looks ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you check  the IP 10.0.33.1 is reachable from system vm ?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Wei
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 03:30, jaejong <cb...@naver.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > OS : Rocky 8.8
> > > > > > ACS : 4.18.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ACS management server listem 8250 port only from ipv6(tcp6)
> > > > > > So SystemVMs can not connect to server.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How to Fix to listen on ipv4?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2023-10-04 00:18:10,281 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (main:null)
> Agent
> > > > [id =
> > > > > > 2 : type = PremiumSecondaryStorageResource : zone = 1 : pod = 1 :
> > > > > workers =
> > > > > > 5 : host = 10.0.33.1 : port = 8250
> > > > > > 2023-10-04 00:18:10,300 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:null)
> > > > > Connecting
> > > > > > to 10.0.33.1:8250
> > > > > > 2023-10-04 00:18:13,358 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection]
> (main:null)
> > > > > Unable
> > > > > > to initialize the threads.
> > > > > > java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
> > > > > >         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect0(Native Method)
> > > > > >         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:483)
> > > > > >         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:472)
> > > > > >         at java.base/sun.nio.ch
> > > > > > .SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:692)
> > > > > >         at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioClient.init(NioClient.java:56)
> > > > > >         at
> > > > com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.start(NioConnection.java:95)
> > > > > >         at com.cloud.agent.Agent.start(Agent.java:283)
> > > > > >         at
> > > > com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchNewAgent(AgentShell.java:454)
> > > > > >         at
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgentFromClassInfo(AgentShell.java:431)
> > > > > >         at
> > > com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:415)
> > > > > >         at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.start(AgentShell.java:511)
> > > > > >         at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.main(AgentShell.java:541)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ netstat -tulpn
> > > > > > Active Internet connections (only servers)
> > > > > > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address           Foreign Address
> > > >  State
> > > > > >      PID/Program name
> > > > > > tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:892             0.0.0.0:*
> > > > > >  LISTEN      1533/rpc.mountd
> > > > > > tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:2049            0.0.0.0:*
> > > > > >  LISTEN      -
> > > > > > tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:32803           0.0.0.0:*
> > > > > >  LISTEN      -
> > > > > > tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:3306            0.0.0.0:*
> > > > > >  LISTEN      1127/mysqld
> > > > > > tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:111             0.0.0.0:*
> > > > > >  LISTEN      1/systemd
> > > > > > tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:662             0.0.0.0:*
> > > > > >  LISTEN      1532/rpc.statd
> > > > > > tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:22              0.0.0.0:*
> > > > > >  LISTEN      1036/sshd
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::8250                 :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1454/java
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::36667                :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1454/java
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::892                  :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1533/rpc.mountd
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::41533                :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1454/java
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::2049                 :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      -
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::9090                 :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1454/java
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::32803                :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      -
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::33060                :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1127/mysqld
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::111                  :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1/systemd
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::8080                 :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1454/java
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::662                  :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1532/rpc.statd
> > > > > > tcp6       0      0 :::22                   :::*
> > > > > > LISTEN      1036/sshd
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to