HI...Any update please... On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:14 PM MP B <mpbraj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Understood So if it is dedicated interface the cloudstack host with its > own IP which connects to storage IP (same subnet) where you mention when > configuring Primary Storage. But in a HyperConverged environment all > interfaces and IP's are in the same host, so is it going to be 2 diff > subnets (cloudstack host on one segment and storage on another segment ?, > if you can provide a network diagram with the IP's would be really helpful.. > > Iam copying the image again here, its a sample I wired in under GNS3, I > know the ClusterReplication network will have its own subnet...The Ceph-CS > node will have 4 nic interfaces...Am I correct ? > > > [image: Ceph_Network-01.png] > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 9:54 AM Jithin Raju <jithin.r...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > >> Hi MP, >> >> I can’t see the image but you don’t have mix the cloudstack networks with >> the primary storage connectivity from host. It is usually a dedicated >> interface on the host having access to the primary storage. >> >> -Jithin >> >> From: MP B <mpbraj...@gmail.com> >> Date: Tuesday, 10 September 2024 at 8:16 PM >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: separate Storage nic >> Ok, I understood thats brings me to following question...so how the >> physical connectivity going to be if I am using lets say ceph HCI cluster >> as per the network diagram...how to achieve this...I have majorly shown the >> HCI storage cluster network..what are the IP's to be assigned...please if >> you can direct me to a particular site where a similar doc available to >> deploy and test.. >> >> [cid:ii_m0wjiccc0] >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:51 PM Jeroen Kleijer <jeroen.klei...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jeroen.klei...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi MP, >> >> As per my experience, storage migrations or storage vMotion or basically >> the migration of the VM's data disk from one datastore to another do >> indeed >> go over the Mgt interface and _not_ the storage interface. (I was confused >> by that as well in the beginning) >> The storage network is, as Alex explains, used for the Secondary Storage >> Traffic: downloading and storing ISO images and Templates etc. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jeroen Kleijer >> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 9:54 AM MP B <mpbraj...@gmail.com<mailto: >> mpbraj...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> > HI Alex, Thanks for you reply... >> > >> > I did create a separate physical network while Zone creation and the >> > Centos5.5 template was not downloading... >> > >> > so you are saying that even if having a separate NIC for storage, the >> > primary storage will still go through MGMT interface ? >> > >> > I am looking at similar solution as per the diagram ( >> > >> https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/conceptsandterminology/storage_setup.html >> > ) >> > >> > [image: image.png] >> > >> > [image: image.png] >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 6:35 PM Alex Mattioli < >> alex.matti...@shapeblue.com<mailto:alex.matti...@shapeblue.com>> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> This is definitely the place for help with anything ACS. >> >> >> >> One thing to be aware of is that the storage network setup in ACS >> handles >> >> only the Secondary storage traffic. >> >> During the Zone Creation wizard, on the Physical Networks part, you >> need >> >> to add a new traffic type (there's a + button there somewhere), and >> select >> >> storage and input the appropriate traffic label. >> >> (If you run into any problems I can give you more detailed >> instructions). >> >> >> >> As for the Centos 5.5 template, I assume that by syncing you mean not >> >> downloading, is that correct? If that's the case I suggest you login to >> >> SSVM and check for internet connectivity, there's also a test script >> which >> >> is very useful: /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh It's quite >> self >> >> explanatory, if you see any errors feel free to paste the results. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Alex >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: MP B <mpbraj...@gmail.com<mailto:mpbraj...@gmail.com>> >> >> Sent: 08 September 2024 04:00 >> >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> >> >> Subject: separate Storage nic >> >> >> >> HI....Please direct me if this is not the right channel for help >> regards >> >> to configuration >> >> >> >> I was able to configure cloudstack with 2 nics which is Guest+Public >> and >> >> Mgmt+Storage...I wanted to test with 3 nics with separate storage nic, >> >> Mgmt+let >> >> me know how I can achieve this...I did configure it myself but the >> issue >> >> was that the template(centos 5.5) was not syncing and no error also. >> both >> >> SystemVM was fine... >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance... >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>
