Hi Alex,
  I just want to know the performance between the cloudstack with NFS and other 
with FC. Whether we can use CloudStack as an important role.
  As you can see, I have tested in 8 ways with fio. The 4k test was only done 
with iometer that I used.
  But, as you suggested, I have increased the number of workers from 1 to 10, 
and the 4k read IOPS has increased from 11k to 49k!
  Such a good news. I'm running the same jobs now. We can see the result 40 
minutes later.
 



---- Replied Message ----
| From | Alex Mattioli<alex.matti...@shapeblue.com> |
| Date | 11/18/2024 21:57 |
| To | users@cloudstack.apache.org<users@cloudstack.apache.org> |
| Subject | RE: about the storage perfonmance |
Hi Leo,

And what exactly are you trying to test? Which workload?
Why did you choose sequential reads of 4k? How many workers did you setup?

Thanks
Alex




-----Original Message-----
From: Leo <szz...@163.com>
Sent: 18 November 2024 14:32
To: users@cloudstack.apach… <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: users@cloudstack.apach… <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: about the storage perfonmance

Hi,
By the ESXi test, I have installed a single ESXi on a machine.
By the Cloudstack test, I used the KVM.


Best regards.  

Leo  



---- Replied Message ----
| From | Alex Mattioli<alex.matti...@shapeblue.com> | Date | 11/18/2024
| 21:16 | To | users@cloudstack.apache.org<users@cloudstack.apache.org>
| | Subject | RE: about the storage perfonmance |
Hi Leo,

CloudStack can orchestrate VMWare, KVM and XenServer, which one of those are 
you using?

Thanks
Alex




-----Original Message-----
From: Leo <szz...@163.com>
Sent: 18 November 2024 13:48
To: users@cloudstack.apach… <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: users@cloudstack.apach… <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: about the storage perfonmance

Hi,
Tanks.
"NFS on CloudStack" means using NFS as primary storage and running VMs on it.
We will running  PostgreSQL  and apps on the cluster.
Only one worker at a time.
Is there something wrong with my testing methods?  

Best regards.

Leo
‍    


---- Replied Message ----
| From | Alex Mattioli<alex.matti...@shapeblue.com> | Date | 11/18/2024
| 18:56 | To | users@cloudstack.apache.org<users@cloudstack.apache.org>
| | Subject | RE: about the storage perfonmance |
Hi,

What do you mean by “NFS on CloudStack”?  Do you mean NFS on KVM?
Why are running 4K sequential for your tests?  What’s the workload you are 
actually trying to test for?
How many workers do you have setup for IOMETER?

Cheers
Alex



From: 史洲洲 <szz...@163.com>
Sent: 18 November 2024 03:23
To: users@cloudstack.apach… <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: about the storage perfonmance

Hi,

Sorry, I need to send this mail again. This is the same question, only append 
the url for the images.

I have tested the storage performance of my storage system using three 
different methods:


1. Using the NFS protocol with a 10G network, on VMware ESXi, with a 4K block 
size and 100% sequential read operations.


Url of this image: https://s2.loli.net/2024/11/18/WFsek69I3ZBblvQ.png


[cid:576a5437$1$1933d1487cb$Coremail$szz799$163.com]
2. Using the NFS protocol with a 10G network, on Cloudstack, with a 4K block 
size and 100% sequential read operations.
Mounted with these:  'vers=4.1,nconnect=16'

*   Url of this image: 
https://s2.loli.net/2024/11/18/a2WY3gpGVA6XeCO.png<https://s2.loli.net/2024/11/18/a2WY3gpGVA6XeCO.png>
[cid:50da97e1$2$1933d1487cb$Coremail$szz799$163.com]
3. Using the FC protocol with 16G , on Cloudstack, treating the LUN accessed 
via FC as a local disk, with a 4K block size and 100% sequential read 
operations.


Url of this image: https://s2.loli.net/2024/11/18/WFsek69I3ZBblvQ.png

[cid:5401a69f$3$1933d1487cb$Coremail$szz799$163.com]

The results show : with the same storage system, the average I/O response time 
is best (0.32) when using NFS with VMware ESXi. The second is FC-SAN with 
Cloudstack (1.25), and the worst is NFS with Cloudstack.

Even the NFS with ESXi is better than fc-san?

I believe there may be some configurations that could improve the storage 
performance when using Cloudstack. I would greatly appreciate it if anyone 
could offer some advice or solutions to help me optimize the Cloudstack storage 
performance.

Thank you very much for your attention.

Best regards.

Leo.




Reply via email to