Hi Bernardo, It was indeed the lack of affinity group selection that did the trick. I wasn't aware that upon dedication of resources, this would be necessary but this seems to work now.
Thanks! Jeroen Kleijer On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 12:34 PM Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves < bernardomg2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, Jeroen > > In CloudStack, when an infrastructure resource (such as a host, cluster, > pod, or zone) is dedicated to an account or domain, an affinity group of > the "ExplicitDedication" type is automatically created. > > As a result, when deploying a VM intended to run on a dedicated resource, > it is necessary to select the "Advanced Mode" toggle in the VM wizard form > and select the affinity group associated with the resource dedication. This > is likely the reason for the VM deployment failure in the described > scenario. Selecting the affinity group should resolve the issue. > > Best regards, > Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves (bernardodemarco) > > Em sex., 6 de dez. de 2024 às 06:57, Jeroen Kleijer < > jeroen.klei...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've created an ACS setup where we have different accounts, setup > projects > > matching those accounts and created several different clusters. > > We have three clusters each dedicated to a different account. > > > > If I now try to create a VM, it will fail with the message: > > No destination found for a deployment for VM instance.... > > > > If I go to the ACS Management logs, I notice the following: > > Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [19, 22, 25], hosts: [] > > > > Those three IDs are the IDs of my clusters. > > > > If I now release a particular cluster, and try to deploy a VM again, it > > will succeed. Looking at the corresponding log messages, I notice the > > following: > > Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [22, 25], hosts: [] > > > > So then it is able to deploy a VM. > > > > The strange thing is... this deployment of VMs fails as both the "admin" > > account as well as a user account that belongs to the ACS Account to > which > > the cluster is dedicated. > > > > So my question basically boils down to this: > > - is my understanding of how the "dedicated" feature is supposed to work, > > correct? (if not, then please enlighten me :) ) > > - if it is correct, are we hitting a bug or something? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Jeroen Kleijer > > >
