GitHub user wido added a comment to the discussion: Host based routing - EVPN-VXLAN to the host - Single VXLAN Device (SVD)
Interesting. So you add a virtual switch (veth) to the bridge and you also tell how to map the VLAN to a VNI. In your case you use 330 and 10330, but in the CS case these would be identical. How would this work with libvirt? Because right now we use an XML definition where we just plug the VM into a bridge. In this it seems we also need to know the VNI when creating the VM, this means you would need to make more adjustments to CloudStack. And my last question: Super cool, but what is the true benefit? Performance? Scale? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10786#discussioncomment-12990901 ---- This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: users-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org