GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Bridge interface not recognized for newly added host if they don't have a physical interface attached
> > in your previous reply, it showed that the eno2 is present > > I think I mixed up br_npf0 and br_bgp0 in my tests (deleted & recreated > bridges multiple times in order to diagnose my issue). > > Point is, my bgp interface, the bridge br_bgp0 with a vxlan interface, wasn't > accepted by Cloudstack agent since the bridge test complained that there > wasn't a physical interface. There's still no physical interface yet, but I > fooled the agent test by creating a dummy interface slave in that bridge and > naming it ethdummy0. > > ``` > ls /sys/devices/virtual/net/br_bgp0/brif > ethdummy0 vx_wg0 > ``` > > I think those tests should be relaxed, as I think they only should test that > there are other interfaces than vnet* connected to the bridge. hmm, has the kvm host been added to cloudstack ? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10804#discussioncomment-13004294 ---- This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: users-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org
