+1 (binding)

Tested with a KVM environment

   -

   Verified VM lifecycle operations and deployment from a snapshot or
   volume using NFS and StorPool as primary storage.
   -

   Tested VM and volume snapshot functionality with NFS and StorPool.
   -

   Validated snapshot copying to primary storage in another zone using two
   StorPool primary storage.
   -

   Confirmed VM deployment using a copied snapshot in another zone with
   StorPool as primary storage.
   - StorPool integration tests


Best regards,
Slavka

On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 1:10 PM Abhisar Sinha <abhisar.si...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Tested VM/Volume snapshots, Resource Limits, NAS backup and recovery and
> Shared Filesystems on KVM.
>
>
> Regards
> Abhisar
>
>
>
>
> From: Kiran Chavala <kiran.chav...@shapeblue.com>
> Date: Monday, 25 August 2025 at 1:09 PM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org <d...@cloudstack.apache.org>,
> users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC5)
> +1
>
> Tested vm, volume, template lifecycle operations against kvm,vmware and
> xenserver hypervisors
>
>
> Also based on last tests against olds RCs
> Regards
> Kiran
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Harikrishna Patnala <harikrishna.patn...@shapeblue.com>
> Date: Monday, 25 August 2025 at 9:56 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>,
> d...@cloudstack.apache.org <d...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC5)
> +1 (binding), based on new RC5 testing and my last tests against old RCs.
>
> Thank you,
> Harikrishna
>
>
>
>
> From: Rene Peinthor <rene.peint...@linbit.com>
> Date: Monday, 25 August 2025 at 2:32 AM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org <d...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC5)
> +1
>
> Tested Linstor integration tests.
>
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 7:35 PM Nicolas Vazquez <
> nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Tested on KVM environment + NFS storage:
> >
> >   *
> > CKS enhancements
> >   *
> > Netris integration on new zone
> >   *
> > VM lifecycle operations
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nicolas Vazquez
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> > Date: Friday, 22 August 2025 at 7:21 AM
> > To: dev <d...@cloudstack.apache.org>, users <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC5)
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Based on RC4 environment and basic cloud resource lifecycle & actions, in
> > an EL8 environment.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti <sureshanapa...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2025 14:32
> > To: dev <d...@cloudstack.apache.org>; users <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC5)
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have created a 4.21.0.0 release (RC5), with the following artifacts up
> > for testing and a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SHA:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.21.0.0-RC20250822T1142
> > Commit: f9513b47bf8cda46c2cee7e31d4d662346bc7399
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.21.0.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using D6E0581ECF8A2FBE3FF6B3C9D7CEAE3A9E71D0AA):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (excluding the weekend).
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC5) are
> > available here:
> > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.21.0.0-RC5/
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Suresh
> >
>

Reply via email to