Hi Brad
I am not facing the issue , here is the terraform config that I have used screenshot https://prnt.sc/8FOLXkgwmYWm --------- resource "cloudstack_ipaddress" "bastion" { vpc_id = "b12facb3-5787-4ce9-bee2-0ea8d676e26d" zone = "fe54a4ca-6ca8-4ac9-9769-dbc1244f138b" } resource "cloudstack_port_forward" "bastion" { ip_address_id = cloudstack_ipaddress.bastion.id forward { protocol = "tcp" private_port = 22 public_port = 5022 virtual_machine_id = "92e55318-2ae3-457c-811a-d6885efb381c" } depends_on = [ cloudstack_ipaddress.bastion ] } terraform apply Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols: + create Terraform will perform the following actions: # cloudstack_ipaddress.bastion will be created + resource "cloudstack_ipaddress" "bastion" { + id = (known after apply) + ip_address = (known after apply) + is_portable = false + is_source_nat = (known after apply) + project = (known after apply) + tags = (known after apply) + vpc_id = "b12facb3-5787-4ce9-bee2-0ea8d676e26d" + zone = "fe54a4ca-6ca8-4ac9-9769-dbc1244f138b" } # cloudstack_port_forward.bastion will be created + resource "cloudstack_port_forward" "bastion" { + id = (known after apply) + ip_address_id = (known after apply) + managed = false + forward { + private_end_port = (known after apply) + private_port = 22 + protocol = "tcp" + public_end_port = (known after apply) + public_port = 5022 + uuid = (known after apply) + virtual_machine_id = "92e55318-2ae3-457c-811a-d6885efb381c" # (1 unchanged attribute hidden) } } Plan: 2 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy. Do you want to perform these actions? Terraform will perform the actions described above. Only 'yes' will be accepted to approve. Enter a value: yes cloudstack_ipaddress.bastion: Creating... cloudstack_ipaddress.bastion: Creation complete after 1s [id=ae73e8e4-93ea-46de-95ff-eece5828cdb5] cloudstack_port_forward.bastion: Creating... cloudstack_port_forward.bastion: Creation complete after 5s [id=ae73e8e4-93ea-46de-95ff-eece5828cdb5] Regards kiran From: Brad House <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 30 September 2025 at 10:42 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.6.0 RC-2 It appears port forwarding is still broken even though this discussion indicated it was fixed: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/227 $ terraform init -upgrade ... Initializing provider plugins... - Finding cloudstack/cloudstack versions matching "0.6.0-rc2"... - Installing cloudstack/cloudstack v0.6.0-rc2... - Installed cloudstack/cloudstack v0.6.0-rc2 (self-signed, key ID 7B3F1C5E93F97FAB) Terraform will perform the following actions: # cloudstack_port_forward.bastion will be created + resource "cloudstack_port_forward" "bastion" { + id = (known after apply) + ip_address_id = "02aae2fe-ae43-4030-8123-8967931fd7e1" + managed = false + forward { + private_end_port = (known after apply) + private_port = 22 + protocol = "tcp" + public_end_port = (known after apply) + public_port = 5022 + uuid = (known after apply) + virtual_machine_id = "bebcac94-65f5-4c73-8586-e6e860bcc17e" # (1 unchanged attribute hidden) } } Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy. Do you want to perform these actions? Terraform will perform the actions described above. Only 'yes' will be accepted to approve. Enter a value: yes cloudstack_port_forward.bastion: Creating... cloudstack_port_forward.bastion: Still creating... [00m10s elapsed] cloudstack_port_forward.bastion: Still creating... [00m20s elapsed] ╷ │ Error: Provider produced inconsistent result after apply │ │ When applying changes to cloudstack_port_forward.bastion, provider "provider[\"registry.terraform.io/cloudstack/cloudstack\"]" produced an unexpected new value: Root object │ was present, but now absent. │ │ This is a bug in the provider, which should be reported in the provider's own issue tracker. ╵ On 9/30/25 5:30 AM, Kiran Chavala wrote: > Hi ALL > > I've created a CloudStack Terraform Provider release candidate for version > 0.6.0, with the following artefacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > https://github.com/cloudstack/terraform-provider-cloudstack > > Commit: 919a358fcc951724c2364ee363a9a055258b1fc3 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudstack-terraform-provider-0.6.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using E03379CB066175FAC2BC9E027B3F1C5E93F97FAB): > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For testing/voting purposes, you can use the provider > > terraform { > required_providers { > cloudstack = { > source = "cloudstack/cloudstack" > version = "0.6.0-rc2" > } > } > } > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >
