Guys, just keep in mind: virt-v2v (if at any time implemented as part of
future Marvin tests) will fail to convert specifically Debian 13 + EFI
(trying to remember if also + Secure boot, but I think just EFI is causing
it) -
https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/commit/bf4e7e1874cfb2c4e17bacb6c28ae8ac597cfb8a

Otherwise +1 on it!


Andrija Panić
openvddk.com


On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 5:56 PM Nux <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've updated the directory with VHD and OVA files as well, "works on my
> laptop"!
>
> https://jenkins.openvm.eu/files/deftmpl/
>
> On 2026-10-15 02:09, Nux wrote:
> > I've manipulated a Debian 13 genericcloud image into a possible
> > CloudStack default template.
> > Build script and samples here, everything is explained in the script,
> > I'd appreciate your thoughts, especially around security and SSH
> > access.
> >
> > https://jenkins.openvm.eu/files/deftmpl/
> >
> > Lucian
> >
> > On 2026-10-12 10:14, Kiran Chavala wrote:
> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] Replacing the default built-in CentOS template in
> >> CloudStack
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'd like to start a discussion on replacing the default built-in
> >> template
> >> that ships with every CloudStack installation.
> >>
> >> The original GitHub discussion is here, and you're welcome to comment
> >> there
> >> as well:
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/13797
> >>
> >> Today, the built-in templates registered for each hypervisor are quite
> >> outdated:
> >>
> >> - KVM: CentOS 5.5 (64-bit) no GUI
> >>
> >>
> http://download.cloudstack.org/releases/2.2.0/eec2209b-9875-3c8d-92be-c001bd8a0faf.qcow2.bz2
> >> - XenServer: CentOS 5.6 (64-bit) no GUI
> >>
> >>
> http://download.cloudstack.org/templates/builtin/centos56-x86_64.vhd.bz2
> >> - vSphere: CentOS 5.3 (64-bit) no GUI
> >>   http://download.cloudstack.org/releases/2.2.0/CentOS5.3-x86_64.ova
> >>
> >> These templates are no longer practical, even for basic testing:
> >>
> >> 1. The VM deploys, but the SSH service doesn't work, so it's of little
> >> use
> >> for validating a fresh installation.
> >> 2. They're starting to break outright on newer hypervisors. On ACS
> >> 4.22
> >> with XenServer 8.4, deploying a VM from the default CentOS template
> >> fails
> >> with "Cannot find Template CentOS 7 on XenServer host", because
> >> XenServer
> >> 8.4 has deprecated the CentOS 7 guest template (tracked in
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/13798).
> >>
> >> What I'd like to see is a new default template that is:
> >>
> >> - current, and in line with what users actually run today
> >> - small in footprint, so it downloads quickly and can be used for
> >> quick
> >> testing right after installation
> >> - functional for the core guest features: root password reset, SSH
> >> keys,
> >> user data, and cloud-init
> >>
> >> Candidates I've looked at:
> >>
> >> - macchinina (https://github.com/NuxRo/macchinina)
> >> - Alpine Linux cloud images (https://alpinelinux.org/cloud/)
> >> - CirrOS (https://github.com/cirros-dev/cirros)
> >> - Debian cloud images (https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/)
> >> - Ubuntu minimal cloud images (
> >> https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/minimal/releases/)
> >> - AlmaLinux Generic Cloud (
> >> https://wiki.almalinux.org/cloud/Generic-cloud.html)
> >> - Rocky Linux (https://wiki.rockylinux.org/rocky/image/)
> >> - Fedora Cloud (https://fedoraproject.org/cloud/download/)
> >>
> >> My personal preference is between two options:
> >>
> >> 1. macchinina: built for CloudStack testing, but it needs a refresh
> >> and
> >> someone to maintain it going forward.
> >> 2. Alpine cloud image: very small and well maintained upstream. We'd
> >> need
> >> to run tests to confirm password, SSH key, and user-data behaviour
> >> across
> >> hypervisors.
> >>
> >> Most of the mainstream distro cloud images are in the 500-600 MB
> >> range,
> >> which goes against the "quick test after install" goal.
> >>
> >> I'd love to hear the community's views on:
> >>
> >> - which image (or images) you'd prefer as the default
> >> - any hypervisor-specific concerns (KVM / XenServer-XCP-ng / VMware)
> >>
> >>
> >> If there's rough consensus, I'm happy to follow up with a PR and
> >> testing
> >> across hypervisors.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kiran Chavala
>

Reply via email to