>>> Muhammad Sharfuddin <[email protected]> schrieb am 07.07.2015 um >>> 11:15 in Nachricht <[email protected]>:
[...] > I don't understand the advantage of Ocfs2 file system in such a setup. The advantage depends on the alternatives: If two nodes both want to access the same filesystem, you can use OCFS2, NFS, or CIFS (list not complete). If only one node can access a filesystem, you could try any journaled filesystem (a fsck is needed after a node crash). If you use NFS or CIFS, you shift the problem to another machine. If you use a local filesystem, you need recovery, mount, and start of your application on a standby node. With OCFS2 you'll have to wait for a few seconds before your application can continue. Note that a usual SCSI disk with read-errors can also delay I/O significantly while retrying I/O. Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
